First Amendment rights scrapped / Delaware Shootings
Why were three members of the Matusiewicz family indicted
and arrested by Federal Authorities on August 8, 2013. Is it an effort to protect Delaware Attorney
General, Beau Biden, the son of Vice President Joe Biden?
We believe the reason
is that this case will destroy the future political career of Beau Biden unless
the entire Matusiewicz family can be discredited. If the Matusiewicz family story is ever
properly investigated by the State of Delaware or by the FBI, it will reveal
that they are being used as pawns for Biden’s political ambitions. Again, it
was overheard in the Federal Building, “The prosecution of these white people
will please the public.”
If there is doubt in
anyone’s mind, this current development demonstrates that the current US
Government administration sees the United States Constitution as an outdated
relic to be ignored in its pursuit of ever greater political power over the
American people.
The First Amendment
to the United States Constitution states, “Congress
shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
On February 11, 2013,
Thomas Matusiewicz, a distraught Father and Grandfather went into a Courthouse
in Wilmington, Delaware and shot to death his son’s ex-wife and a friend and
then killed himself.
Yesterday, August 8,
2013, Federal Authorities indicted three surviving members of the Matusiewicz
family each with 25 counts of “cyber-stalking” of the late ex-wife. Just what is cyber-stalking”? We’ve all heard of “cyber-bullying” which is
self-explanatory, but “cyber-stalking”?
Are you guilty of doing the same thing?
Have you looked at
anyone’s Facebook lately or checked someone’s profile on “LinkedIn”? Are you about to be arrested?
Well, perhaps these
people are career criminals, serial killers or terrorists. Just who are they? David Matusiewicz is, or was, an Optometrist
who built a strong practice and donated liberally to charities like the Special
Olympics. He was and remains the loving
Father of three little girls who are now lost in the State of Delaware’s Foster
Care system. His sister, Amy Gonzalez is
a long-time nurse, care-giver and Mother.
Lenore Matusiewicz is the widow of Thomas and Mother of David and Amy,
grandmother to the three little girls.
She spent most of her adult life as a teacher and care-giver to ladies
with learning disabilities. Until
February, she was retired and living a quiet life on a small farm in Southern
Texas.
While David and his
ex-wife were married, these family members and Thomas all experienced a variety
of strange interactions with his ex-wife including personal threats and unusual
treatment of the three girls. These
situations and events were intermingled with “sweet-as pie” behavior. At the time, the ex-wife was taking a variety
of medications for emotional problems including depression. When the couple was divorced the family tried
to bring these issues to the attention of the Family Court, only to have their
concerns quashed by the attorneys in the interest of simplifying the divorce
and custody proceedings. They then brought their concerns to the attention of
the appropriate State Agency, charged with the investigation of such
allegations. That agency did nothing
despite its responsibilities to the children.
Faced with threats against the girls, David decided to take the girls
and flee to Central America. His Mother
accompanied them thinking it would not be possible for a single male to take
proper care of three small girls.
Eventually, they were found and arrested, David for paternal kidnapping and
Lenore for endangerment. While most
family members who are convicted on such charges have been fined or received
brief prison sentences, David was sentenced to several years in prison. At the reported prompting of his ex-wife, his
Optometric license was revoked and he is unable to pursue his profession. David was released on probation early in
2012.
Despite his inability
to work as an optometrist, his ex-wife was demanding child support payments as
if he still maintained his practice.
Attempts at mediation failed, resulting in David being ordered to appear
in the Delaware Court on February 11, 2013 for a hearing on the child support
issue. Because he could not fly and rent
a car, his parents drove with him to Delaware, leading to Thomas’ fateful
encounter with the ex-wife in the Courthouse Lobby.
After the shooting,
David was held in custody, advised that he was being held as a witness. He was apparently placed on a suicide
watch. Later charges were brought
against him because he had prudently chosen to spend the night before the
hearing at a location near the Courthouse, due to predictions of a snowstorm
the next morning, rather than at an approved location at least three hours away. Ultimately, he was charged with a violation
of his parole because the Court believed he had to have known about his Father
keeping weapons at the residence that had been approved by his probation
officer. He was ordered imprisoned for
an additional six months. He was to be
released on August 12, 2013.
Instead, David, his
sister and Mother are all under arrest for “cyber-stalking” his ex-wife. Faced with the refusal of Delaware’s
authorities to properly investigate their concerns about the safety of the
three little girls, David, Lenore and Amy made their pleas public via the
internet, seeking understanding and assistance in their efforts to find
protection for the girls. Because the
Delaware Authorities refused to investigate their concerns, they have been
labeled in the indictments as false accusations. The fact that the authorities wrote those
allegations off as typical divorce/custody issues does not make them
false. The reality is that only the
people in David’s home know what went on and only they can tell us about their
experiences. They chose to do this on
the internet in the hope that someone would read their plea and give them some
kind of assistance or guidance.
The fact is that the
Delaware Authorities failed to properly investigate this family’s concerns
despite their mandated obligation to do so.
As a result, three people are dead by violence and three young girls are
lost in foster care. Now the Federal Authorities are indicting the family
members for telling their side of the story on the internet. They couch their charges as attacks on
David’s ex-wife, but in reality they are trying to punish the family members
for publicly revealing the negligence and incompetence of the Delaware
authorities and Courts.
· Something
more sinister may be behind the arrest of this entire family. While M’Linda Kula was waiting in the
reception area of the office of the Federal Public Defender, District of
Delaware, she witnessed a gentleman enter that area. He then entered the office space and was
overheard to say, “The prosecution of
these white people will please the public.”
!!!!!! The authorities have stripped the entire family of all their
rights to free speech, they have
hijacked the (3) children and they have jailed the grandmother (Lenore), her
daughter, Amy and the father, Dr. DAVID.
One member of this group stated that David would never see his children
again!
We have all heard of
“cyber-bullying” and there is no doubt that it goes on, particularly among the
media-savvy youth of today. But Lenore
and Amy’s use of the internet was nothing of this sort. It was a plea for understanding and
assistance in their efforts to protect those three little girls. Putting the facts in front of anyone and
everyone that may be interested has proven effective before. The reporting of government abuses via the
internet is credited with the creation of the “Arab Spring”. Totalitarian regimes around the world have
sought to repress the use of the internet to disclose their abuses. In China, people have been arrested, tortured
and killed, and the internet periodically shut down to prevent the release of
real information to the outside world.
Now apparently the Government of the United States is willing to follow
the same course of action. This is supposed
to be the “free-est” country in the world.
How free are we when we can’t tell what we know just because it points a
critical finger at our public authorities?
Think about it. An American citizen is currently being
protected by Russian Authorities against an American Government angered by his
revealing to the world that the United States spies on its own citizens. Excuse me but which side of the old “Iron
Curtain” have we been living on?
Face it, this
government has repeatedly attacked the United States Constitution and the
rights it protects. Direct attacks
garner bad publicity and political outrage, but they have learned that they can
accomplish their goals through the Courts, gradually changing the
interpretation of the law behind closed doors and with only a few attorneys
being the wiser. Yes, we are on a
slippery slope and maybe on the way to losing another of our cherished
freedoms. On this slope, do you stand
among the guilty? Do you even know?
The facts about the
Matusiewicz family are available on Jonbenetstruecasehistory.com under the tab,
“A Grandmother’s Impossible Choice”.
There is also a three part Youtube video available under Delaware
Courthouse Shooting/Mr. Douglas Millar CEO Unite4J.
If this attempt to
revoke the Matusiewicz family’s right to free speech offends you, please send
any donation you can afford to Mr. Douglas Millar on behalf of the Matusiewicz
family. If these good and upstanding
people can lose their right of free speech for the sake of political
grandstanding, then we are all at risk of losing our Constitutional Rights.
<< Home