Heros and Heroines

Ron Paul - Predictions in Due Time (Original)

2012-01-14T20:28:00.000-05:00

Father Nathan Monk at Pensacola City Council

2011-12-29T20:17:00.000-05:00

Shocking!! Man explains to WFTV News why he loves the Orlando Police Dep...

2011-10-09T13:18:00.001-04:00

Why must the American people re-learn the lessons of history?

Here is an excerpt from Chapter 19 of the ancient Book of Jasher. In this account you will find that it was the decisions of "four judges" (not homosexuality) that gave a bad name to the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.

31 And Paltith daughter of Lot went forth that day to fetch water, and she put bread into her pitcher of water, and she went to draw water by the poor man's place, and she took out the bread from the pitcher and gave it to the poor man and he ate it.

32 And the three men saw what Paltith did to the poor man, and they said to her, It is thou then who hast supported him, and therefore has he not starved, nor changed in appearance nor died like the rest.

33 And the three men went out of the place in which they were concealed, and they seized Paltith and the bread which was in the poor man's hand.

34 And they took Paltith and brought her before their judges, and they said to them, Thus did she do, and it is she who supplied the poor man with bread, therefore did he not die all this time; now therefore declare to us the punishment due to this woman for having transgressed our law.

35 And the people of Sodom and Gomorrah assembled and kindled a fire in the street of the city, and they took the woman and cast her into the fire and she was burned to ashes.

The Toronto 9/11 Hearings - 9/11/11

2011-09-13T08:42:00.000-04:00

Sherry Peel Jackson Released From Prison

2011-08-29T11:07:00.000-04:00

Sherry Peel Jackson Released From Prison

Sam Vaknin - Author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited"

2011-08-10T08:46:00.001-04:00

Sam Vaknin offers a strategy that can effectively (and efficiently) remove dysfunction from government by routing and removing destructive narcissists' from leadership positions.

Excerpts from MHMatters, The Narcissist in Therapy:

"Narcissism is not merely a mental health disorder: it is also an organizing principle and an exegetic framework; . . . (HOWEVER) . . . Governments maintain registries of sex offenders and impose a variety of restrictions on them. Similarly, the authorities should maintain registries of people diagnosed with antisocial, narcissistic, and borderline personality disorders (as well as paranoid-schizophrenics and anyone else whose mental disability may harm society). They should impose limitations on their freedoms. . . . narcissists and psychopaths are highly recidivistic, lack remorse or empathy, and are predatory. Like sex offenders, they blend well with "normal" people and, like them, they constitute a clear and present danger to their milieu."

To learn more about how you may have been personally affected by narcissistic leadership read Kings, Priests and Our American Birthright.

Karin Huffer: Legal Abuse Syndrome (PTSD)

2011-07-10T21:38:00.001-04:00

More at the Caught.net Legal Reform Website and the Pro Se Way Website.

Law Enforcement Corruption and Abuse

2011-07-10T21:25:00.000-04:00

Allen Kephart: His family, friends and acquaintences.

The National Veterans Committee on Constitutional Affairs

2011-06-01T09:39:00.000-04:00

On Feb 7th and 8th, 2011, the South Carolina Sound Money Committee conducted an “Economics Summit” in Columbia. Presenters at this summit included; Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Dr. Larry Parks, Aaron Bolinger, and Geoff Turk.

The National Veterans Committee on Constitutional Affairs (NVCCA) assembled a collection of educational videos for members of the general public and state legislators to help them understand both the scope of the problem, and what our states can do to effect positive change. Although some of this material is “South Carolina specific,” the principles and concepts can be applied to any of our nation's union of 50 states.

Have a note pad handy – the subject matter contained is DEEP, including constitutional legal research.

Aaron Biblical Presentation 2 (912) from ethan graham on Vimeo.

Richard I. Fine

2011-03-30T21:05:00.000-04:00

Templates available at How To Disqualify Your State Superior Court Judge & Get A New Trial.

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved?

2011-03-23T08:59:00.009-04:00

UNITED STATES CODE provides the legal definition of "State" and "United States" in 28USC3002:

(14) ``State'' means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) ``United States'' means--

          (A) a Federal corporation;

          (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

          (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

On page 31 of "CURRENT EVENTS", the "Condensed Weekly Newspapers that were used by Teachers in Public and Private Schools" during the 1932 - 1933 school term indoctrinated future generations of Americans to accept a corporate business model of governance.

Because anything other than full disclosure of the nature of a contract is illegal, fraudulent and unethical; and the etiology of a corporate structure of governance had not been fully disclosed (see BUSINESS-AS-USUAL STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING "THE CROWN" INVESTORS and their GLOBAL ANONYMITY) to its share and stock holders; and the acts of its directors and those in control have become illegal, oppressive and fraudulent; and, its assets have been misapplied and wasted, should not the corporation’s unhappy stock/shareholders have recourse to dissolution?

From Dissolution in PA —The Death Of A Pennsylvania Business Corporation:

. . . a shareholder or director may petition the court of common pleas to order the winding up and involuntary dissolution of the corporation if and only if one of the following is established:

The acts of the directors, or those in control of the corporation are illegal, oppressive or fraudulent and that it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved;

The corporate assets are being misapplied or wasted, and it is beneficial to the interests of the shareholders that the corporation be wound up and dissolved; or

The directors are deadlocked in the direction of the management of the business and affairs of the corporation and the shareholders are unable to break the deadlock, such that irreparable injury to the corporation is being suffered or is threatened as a result.

In the absence of illegal or fraudulent activity, a misappropriation of assets to the detriment of one or more shareholders, or irreconcilable differences amongst the board of directors, the corporation’s unhappy shareholders may have no recourse but to suffer the perceived mismanagement or sell their stock, often at a tremendous loss.

Should the corporate United States and the State of Pennsylvania be dissolved? Here are examples of how some shareholders view the management of the business affairs of these 28 USC 3002 corporations.

REPUBLICANS

DEMOCRATS

THE WAYSEER MANIFESTO - [Official Video] (HQ)

2011-03-19T16:17:00.000-04:00

Ukcolumn Roger Hayes Lawful Rebellion Jan 2010

2011-03-10T23:00:00.000-05:00

JURY POWER

2011-02-19T19:07:00.000-05:00

Jurors indicted and jurors found Luzerne County, Pennsylvania "kids for cash" judge Mark Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy.

The defense and prosecution both declared victory after Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. was found guilty on 12 counts and acquitted of 27 Friday, but the former Luzerne County Juvenile Court judge, who would have spent less than seven years in prison under a plea agreement that collapsed in 2009, now faces 13 to 15 years.

A jury in U.S. District Court found Mr. Ciavarella guilty of racketeering and conspiracy for accepting $997,600 from wealthy developer Robert K. Mericle. Mr. Mericle testified he won a contract to build a for-profit juvenile detention center after a referral from Mr. Ciavarella. Read more:

FIJA - Fully Informed Jury Association

2011-02-06T20:34:00.002-05:00

FIJA Questions Florida Judge, Attorney General, and Governor Over Unlawful Order

On Thursday, 3 February 2011, FIJA sent on FIJA letterhead via United States Postal Service certified mail, the following questions to Florida Judge Blevin Perry, Jr., to Florida Governor Rick Scott, and to Attorney General Pam Bondi: Questions for Florida Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr., Governor Rick Scott, and Attorney General Pam Bondi (pdf)

The letter, in part, points out this contradiction:

On 31 January, 2011, Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. has issued an “Administrative Order”, barring peaceful people from engaging in their lawful freedom of speech to peacefully distribute pamphlets, on public property, related to the laws, rights and authority of jurors.

On 8 February 2010, Florida Judge David B. Eddy issued a memorandum stating, “Based on principles of free speech, I believe that whoever is distributing the handouts (referencing FIJA literature) in question has a right to do so. Accordingly, I see no reason why the handouts must be excluded from the jury assembly room. I believe we may trust jurors to follow the law as instructed by the judge.”

A contradiction in the application of the law is evident. Americans seeking to lawfully exercise their lawful rights are subject to being arrested and denied their rights by Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr.’s order.

Because a contradiction of the law is evident, and a damage is threatened by the power of office of Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. we respectfully insist that Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. and the courts and government of Florida, under penalty of fraud and other laws, certify which involved law prevails, not contradicted by any superior law: Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr.’s Administrative Order; or the right of the People to freely express their views in regard to this matter.

William Pawelec Interview

2011-01-22T21:25:00.002-05:00

Treason, sedition, and subversive activities

2010-12-19T22:09:00.000-05:00

Are police officers of your local corporate municipality willing participants in a "seditious conspiracy" to overthrow our guaranteed "republican Form of government"?

Julian Assange, et al.

2010-12-09T22:41:00.000-05:00

The Truth Will Always Win - by Julian Assange

The Australian, December 7, 2010

In 1958 a young Rupert Murdoch, then owner and editor of Adelaide's The News, wrote: "In the race between secrecy and truth, it seems inevitable that truth will always win."

His observation perhaps reflected his father Keith Murdoch's expose that Australian troops were being needlessly sacrificed by incompetent British commanders on the shores of Gallipoli. The British tried to shut him up but Keith Murdoch would not be silenced and his efforts led to the termination of the disastrous Gallipoli campaign.

Nearly a century later, WikiLeaks is also fearlessly publishing facts that need to be made public.

I grew up in a Queensland country town where people spoke their minds bluntly. They distrusted big government as something that could be corrupted if not watched carefully. The dark days of corruption in the Queensland government before the Fitzgerald inquiry are testimony to what happens when the politicians gag the media from reporting the truth.

These things have stayed with me. WikiLeaks was created around these core values. The idea, conceived in Australia , was to use internet technologies in new ways to report the truth.

WikiLeaks coined a new type of journalism: scientific journalism. We work with other media outlets to bring people the news, but also to prove it is true. Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately?

Democratic societies need a strong media and WikiLeaks is part of that media. The media helps keep government honest. WikiLeaks has revealed some hard truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars, and broken stories about corporate corruption.

People have said I am anti-war: for the record, I am not. Sometimes nations need to go to war, and there are just wars. But there is nothing more wrong than a government lying to its people about those wars, then asking these same citizens to put their lives and their taxes on the line for those lies. If a war is justified, then tell the truth and the people will decide whether to support it.

If you have read any of the Afghan or Iraq war logs, any of the US embassy cables or any of the stories about the things WikiLeaks has reported, consider how important it is for all media to be able to report these things freely.

WikiLeaks is not the only publisher of the US embassy cables. Other media outlets, including Britain `s The Guardian, The New York Times, El Pais in Spain and Der Spiegel in Germany have published the same redacted cables.

Yet it is WikiLeaks, as the co-ordinator of these other groups, that has copped the most vicious attacks and accusations from the US government and its acolytes. I have been accused of treason, even though I am an Australian, not a US, citizen. There have been dozens of serious calls in the US for me to be "taken out" by US special forces. Sarah Palin says I should be "hunted down like Osama bin Laden", a Republican bill sits before the US Senate seeking to have me declared a "transnational threat" and disposed of accordingly. An adviser to the Canadian Prime Minister's office has called on national television for me to be assassinated. An American blogger has called for my 20-year- old son, here in Australia, to be kidnapped and harmed for no other reason than to get at me.

And Australians should observe with no pride the disgraceful pandering to these sentiments by Prime Minister Gillard and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have not had a word of criticism for the other media organisations. That is because The Guardian, The New York Times and Der Spiegel are old and large, while WikiLeaks is as yet young and small.

We are the underdogs. The Gillard government is trying to shoot the messenger because it doesn't want the truth revealed, including information about its own diplomatic and political dealings.

Has there been any response from the Australian government to the numerous public threats of violence against me and other WikiLeaks personnel? One might have thought an Australian prime minister would be defending her citizens against such things, but there have only been wholly unsubstantiated claims of illegality. The Prime Minister and especially the Attorney-General are meant to carry out their duties with dignity and above the fray. Rest assured, these two mean to save their own skins. They will not.

Every time WikiLeaks publishes the truth about abuses committed by US agencies, Australian politicians chant a provably false chorus with the State Department: "You'll risk lives! National security! You'll endanger troops!" Then they say there is nothing of importance in what WikiLeaks publishes. It can't be both. Which is it?

It is neither. WikiLeaks has a four-year publishing history. During that time we have changed whole governments, but not a single person, as far as anyone is aware, has been harmed. But the US , with Australian government connivance, has killed thousands in the past few months alone............

In its landmark ruling in the Pentagon Papers case, the US Supreme Court said "only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government". The swirling storm around WikiLeaks today reinforces the need to defend the right of all media to reveal the truth.

[Julian Assange is the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks.]

==========

War.Wikileaks.Protest: Why New Evidence Demands End to Wars

by Medea Benjamin, Leslie Cagan, Tim Carpenter, Gael Murphy, Cindy Sheehan, David Swanson, Debra Sweet

Progressive Democrats of America, December 2, 2010

With Wikileaks Revelations, Peace Community Redoubles Demand for End to Wars and Voices Support for Whistleblowers

While only a tiny fraction of the U.S. diplomatic cables scheduled for publication by Wikileaks have thus far been made available, some conclusions can already be drawn. These cables and the Iraq and Afghan War Diaries provide an opportunity for Americans to see our government for what it is.

Our government is seen here as controlling a global military and espionage empire that impacts every region of the globe and deceives its own population. Secrecy, spying, and hostility have infected our entire government, turning the diplomatic corps into an arm of the CIA and the military, just as the civilian efforts in Afghanistan are described by Richard Holbrooke, who heads them up, as "support for the military." Secret war planning, secret wars, and lies about wars have become routine. The United States is secretly and illegally engaged in a war in Yemen and has persuaded that nation's government to lie about it. The United States has supported a coup in Honduras and lied about it.

We have long known that the war on terrorism was increasing, rather than diminishing, terrorism....

Much of the pressure for war appears to come from within the United States, whose representatives treat the entire world as a hostile enemy to be spied on, lied to, and exploited. The secrecy that permits this behavior must be broken if the United States' approach to the world is to change. Those who have helped to fulfill President Obama's campaign promise of transparency must be protected from his vengeance, while those who have abused positions of diplomatic trust to advance agendas of espionage and war planning must be held accountable.

Our Department of Justice has granted immunity for aggressive war, kidnapping, torture, assassination, and warrantless spying, while pursuing the criminal prosecution of Bradley Manning for allegedly leaking materials to Wikileaks. Were our government to indict Assange or support the extradition or rendition of Assange from anywhere in the world to Sweden, while maintaining that his work and not the Pentagon's has endangered us, our nation's moral standing would reach a new low.

Our government should cease any actions it is taking to prosecute Julian Assange for absurd criminal charges, to pressure Sweden to do so, or to sabotage Wikileaks' servers. Coverups of leaks have a history in Washington of backfiring in the form of larger leaks and scandals. Our State Department should focus on diplomacy and mutually beneficial partnerships with the world community.

We demand an end to all overt and covert wars, a ban on the use of State Department employees and contractors in spying or warfare, and a full investigation of the facts revealed in the Wikileaks cables.

We support the protest of our current wars planned for December 16th, 10 a.m., at the White House.

Signed,

Medea Benjamin, Leslie Cagan, Tim Carpenter, Gael Murphy, Cindy Sheehan, David Swanson, Debra Sweet, Ann Wright, Kevin Zeese

The TSA is out of control

2010-11-17T15:42:00.000-05:00

The TSA is out of control

The Bailout Money and Why You Dont have to Pay Your Mortgage 1/4

2010-11-14T16:06:00.000-05:00

Jon McNaughton

2010-09-19T20:57:00.002-04:00

Have you been forgotten by the men and women who you elected to protect and defend the constitution that was set in place for the United States?

Ed and Elaine Brown (from an anonymous contributor)

2010-08-09T20:09:00.000-04:00

I was going down memory lane and found this video of the first concert at Ed and Elaine Browns. This is Dave Von Kleist doing his song "Show me The Law" As you hear him say it was Joyce's idea to have this concert on the Brown's property to bring attention to their plight against the IRS. Sorry to say, it didn't end so well.

This first concert led to another later that summer,which had many bands that showed up and played until well after dark and then there was a big fireworks display. We had the best hopes that with all the attention on the story, even within the main stream media (even though they spun it) that there would be a happy ending. Ed and Elaine are now serving over 30 years and will never see each other again, as they were both in their 60"s when it all began.

The second concert was sponsored in part by Ted Anderson of GCNLIVE.COM and we had many well known patriots there. We had a lovely appearance by Homeland Security in their shiny expensive Helicopter that flew around the property all day and by 5 pm,they were within 100 ft of the ground taking pictures and trying hard to disrupt the festivities. Ed had to call the local airport to have them call HLS off before he set the fireworks off.

We had a great time and met a lot of good people, ones that are not afraid to stand for their rights. I pray that soon, something will happen to allow Ed and Elaine to be together again. They had 120 acres in New Hampshire with beautiful house that you could only dream of and now it's all gone.

Why? They ask the IRS for over 10 years to show them the law and got no response, so Ed said, we are not going to file until you show us the law. He let them know, he would put the money in escrow and if they showed them the law, he would file and pay. Their answer was, prosecute them and run a rigged trial.

Welcome to Amerika!

When does it all stop?

Just as a comment, I want to thank Ted, The Band Pokerface, Jack Blood and all the wonderful people that showed up to make it a part of history. Maybe someday, we all set down and watch the video of that whole day. But, then again, maybe not!

Jerry and Joe Kane: Heros or Villains/Villeins? (Updated 8-8-2010)

2010-08-08T11:45:00.001-04:00

August 8, 2010 update: More questions about the 'eye witness' account. Click on PROOF OF MURDER & REENACTMENT BY WEST MEMPHIS POLICE.

On July 1, 2010 ABC News (finally) provided to the American people what is presumed to be "the official story" about what happened to Jerry and Joe Kane and two Arkansas policemen who were shot dead on May 20th. But WHY is there such an emphasis on Jerry's claim to being "sovereign"?

Because our constitutional Form of government is a contractual form of government Aren't ALL American's "sovereign"?

If individual sovereignity was not the intent for the people of our nation, what would have motivated our individual and collective 'states' to implement the "castle doctrine"?

Origins

The American interpretation of this doctrine is largely derived from the English Common Law as it stood in the 1700s. In Book 4, Chapter 16 of William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, he says:

And the law of England has so particular and tender a regard to the immunity of a man's house, that it stiles it his castle, and will never suffer it to be violated with immunity: agreeing herein with the sentiments of ancient Rome, as expressed in the works of Tully; quid enim sanctius, quid omni religione munitius, quam domus unusquisque civium? For this reason no doors can in general be broken open to execute any civil process; though, in criminal causes, the public safety supersedes the private. Hence also in part arises the animadversion of the law upon eaves-droppers, nusancers, and incendiaries: and to this principal it must be assigned, that a man may assemble people together lawfully without danger of raising a riot, rout, or unlawful assembly, in order to protect and defend his house; which he is not permitted to do in any other case.

Could it be that history has repeated itself? And that the sovereign people of our nation have been collectively schmoozed by the likes of Pharaoh Rikayon who "cunningly usurped the government of Egypt" by exacting "a tax from the dead"?

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Hear Donna Lee's telephone interview with Anna Marie at WMC TV-5 Memphis as you watch the following soundless video and ask your self if it jives with the "official story" being told more than one month after the event.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Below is an e-mail from a Latino Journalist in San Francisco, and at KTHV, Little Rock, Arkansas you can read one of the official stories about Jerry and Joe Kane on their website. KTHV's article is entitled West Memphis police shooting: Suspects Jerry, Joseph Kane.

There is more posted to the DavidIcke.com forum.

--- On Sat, 5/22/10, Reporteroad@aol.com wrote his personal testimony about Jerry:

I had the honor to have cooked dinner for Jerry and Joe Kane at my place in several occasions. And I did it as if I were doing it for a King and a Prince. They helped me save my rental housing unit from an Unlawful Detainer and from losing my newspaper business from a crook lawyer on a collection agency's lawsuit. The same occured to other Latinos who had the pleasure of meeting Jerry and Joe who also shared a dinner or lunch with them, and who were in great need of legal remedy. The two were inseparable.

Young attendants who came with their parents to some of Jerry's seminars in SF were delighted to see Joe, a young man of about their same age, talk so eloquenly about the law and history. He inspired this one young man, the son of a SF Police Officer, a couple of years ago. The youth, I was told by his father (who attended Jerry's seminar in several occasions), has been studying the law since then.

When Jerry was in the Bay Area, he lived on several occasions with Latino families. So fond was Joe of our culture, that he was learning Spanish. He spoke with me on several occasions and I corrected his pronounciation and taught him a few new words. I also taught Joe a couple times guitar notes... he seemed interested and was enjoying it. I regret I not giving him a guitar a was thinking of providing him with at the time.

I met Jerry and Joe in 2007.

He was a great man, a real human being who loved people and did everything he could to help others without interest for money."Give me for the gas and food and I will go there," he said when my friend Adiliawas about to lose her beautiful house in Lake Tahoe. And the same was at other occassions.

What the corporate news media is doing now, by interviewing the enemies of the Freedom Movementin the United States and publishing conflicting and inacurate information about Jerry Kane - which associate him with the evilness of racism - is with the intention of tainting a whole movement that is awakining from the tyrany of the elite bankers. What they are saying are pure lies. The Secod Amendment to the US Constitution clearly gives every American the license to own and carry a gun. And if Jerry owned one was because he feared for his life. And I have a feeling something extraordinary might have happened in that West Memphis highway on that day, in Arkansas, that caused the tragedy that killed the two police officers and Jerry and Joem and one of their two dogs.

Jerry, a legal seminarist, taught skills in how the people could defend themselves. He never advocated violence. His legal power was much powerful than firepower. But he felt the government wanted to silence him for uncovering the truth about mortagage fraud, information that is now filling up the court houses around the country by the people, and finding out that there is a legal remedy to their debts. And the goal of Jerry was that: teach as many as he could the tools for finding and executing their remedy.

In the name of all Latinos who benefited from the teaching and friendship of Jerry, may Jerry and Joe's souls rest in peace in the Kingdom of God.

Let's all send money donations to Donna Lee Kane to help her afford the expenses of transporting their bodies to Florida and to provide a Christian burial to our two brothers now physically dead.

Funds are now needed. Please send your contributions to:

Donna Lee c/o 501 N Madison Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 or Paypal to deelaeesa@hotmail.com

Marvin,

A Latino journalist in San Francisco

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Consider the following:

Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Edition defines one's "legal name" as ". . . a given or baptismal name, usually assumed at birth, and a surname deriving from the common name of the parents."

Except for the first letter, one's name is generally not capitalized. So what would be the purpose of capitalizing one's name on any document?

Here are some 'doublespeak' reasons to 'capitalize' one's 'name'/'title':

Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Edition defines capitalization as representing " . . . the total amount of the various securities issued by a corporation. Capitalization may include bonds, debentures, preferred and common stock and surplus. Bonds and debentures are usually carried on the books of the issuing company in terms of their par or face value. . . . "

See, also The American Heritage Dictionary; Capitalization:
1. a. The practice or act of capitalizing.
    b. The sum that results from capitalizing.
2. a. The amounts and types of long-term financing used by a firm, including common stock, preferred stock, retained earnings, and long-term debt.
    b. The total par value or stated value of no-par capital stock issues.
3. The use of capital letters in writing or printing.

THE BOTTOM LINE:
Because 'Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness (inclusive of "absolute ownership" of property)' is "unalienable"; ALL LAW IS CONTRACTUAL.   'BAR - NONE.' (Yes. A pun was indeed intended.)

* * * * * * * * * * * *

From Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition:

VILLAIN., An epithet used to cast contempt and contumely on the person to whom it is applied.

     2. To call a man a villain in a letter written to a third person, will entitle him to an action without proof of special damages. 1 Bos. & Pull. 331.

VILLEIN, Engl. law. A species of slave during the feudal times.'

     2. The feudal villein of the lowest order was unprotected as to property, and subjected to the post ignoble services; but his circumstances were very different from the slave of the southern states, for no person was, in the eye of the law, a villein, except as to his master; in relation to all other persons he was a freeman. Litt. Ten. s. 189, 190; Hallam's View of the Middle Ages, vol. i. 122, 124; vol. ii. 199.

VILLENOUS JUDGMENT, punishments. In the English law it was a judgment given by the common law in attaint, or in cases of conspiracy.

     2. Its effects were to make the object of it lose his liberam legem, and become infamous. He forfeited his goods and chattels, and his lands during life; and this barbarous judgment further required that his lands should be wasted, his houses razed, his trees rooted up, and that his body should be cast into-prison. He 'could not be a juror or witness. Burr. 996, 1027; 4 Bl. Com. 136.

Alex Jones

2010-08-02T12:25:00.003-04:00

Alex Jones exposes the 'business-as-usual' operations of the state within the State.

Do you know what your government has in store for you?

What does the United Nation's 'Agenda 21' have to do with ecosystems and health care?

Benjamin Wayne Merring

2010-06-07T13:39:00.002-04:00

One man's fight to live free or die.

Fighting for my Right to use of the common way without being regulated.

Overview

It seems that many have forgotten or perhaps it would be better to say that most of us don't even know what liberty is. They think they live in the freest country in the world. Nothing could be further

from the truth. There is no doubt in my mind that if our founding fathers could see us now the would declare their experiment an absolute and complete failure.

Before you write me off as a complete lunatic consider four simple questions:

What is liberty?

How do you get liberty?

How do you exercise your liberty?

How do you lose your liberty?

A common thought is liberty is freedom. Freedom to do what you want to do.

How do you get it? It is yours for the taking?

How do you exercise your liberty? By doing what you want when you want within the confines of the laws of the government..

How do you lose your liberty? By violating the laws established by government.

These are the answers commonly given and accepted by most but again they are utterly wrong.

That is Liberty? Liberty is an unalienable Right of movement.

How do you get liberty. It is an endowment from your Creator to you

How do you exercise your liberty? By living your life in accordance to His word, His will, the laws of nature as our Creator has ordained.

How do you lose your liberty? By violating his word and living contrary to His will. By ignoring the laws of nature and violating laws and sound judgement of man made governments that honour, respect the Creator.

The Declaration of Independance expounded on this topic;

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, . . . . "

If you do not understand these words then you can not understand liberty.

What is the purpose of government? To secure these rights.

What rights, Life LIBERTY the pursuit of happiness.

Where did these rights come from? Endowed by our Creator.

Who is endowed by our Creator? ALL men equally.

How do we know? These truths are self evident. . .

Either our foundation was a lie or our present situation is a lie but no matter how you slice it both can not be true.

I, as an individual, As a sovereign flesh and blood man Clings it the reality of our foundation and reject out of hand Government that insist on regulating my every movement. I have chosen one area of great contention and have Md it my waterloo.

My argument is that I as a sovereign Flesh and blood man I have a liberty right to travel in my automobile and that the government has no right - no authority to regulate my personal private use of the common way. This stance did lead to my arrest and conviction. Now, through means available to me I seek to overturn my conviction and have there laws ruled unconstitutional as i continue in my struggle fighting4liberty.

Click here for the next segment.

Our nation's men and women who join the military

2010-06-06T21:50:00.001-04:00

ABC 2 Baltimore, Maryland

2010-05-29T11:36:00.000-04:00

A Teaching Moment

2010-05-25T14:21:00.000-04:00

Tammy Christopher

2010-05-23T09:21:00.000-04:00

Courtesy of CopsOutofControl.

Tammy Christopher is suing Grady County Oklahoma after Deputy Sean Kinght shot her dog. While the police officer told her that the dog charged at him when he stopped for direction while serving tax warrants, the video appears to contradict that claim and show Knight shooting the dog in the head.

Gordon and Yorie Kahl

2010-05-22T12:13:00.001-04:00

The Murder Of Gordon Kahl
By Mary Sparrowdancer
©. 2007 All Rights Reserved 2-14-7

Gordon Kahl was viciously murdered in 1983 by a gang of brutal criminals who have never been brought to justice. As though his mere execution was not enough to satisfy his tormentors, they beat the 63-year-old Kahl with the butts of their rifles, breaking multiple bones and teeth and further mutilated him through dismemberment. One foot would later be found under a refrigerator in the ruins of the house that was also destroyed by these terrorists. Kahl was executed at some point on that June day in 1983, via a point-blank shot through the back of his head, but still not satisfied, the terrorists then burned his body beyond recognition. Gordon Kahl had been a highly decorated World War II veteran, a farmer, the father of six, and a tax patriot. He refused to pay taxes to the U.S. federal government after he discovered that the government was operating under the Communist Manifesto rather than the U.S. Constitution. The cold-blooded killers who carried out this atrocity were U.S. government agents. (1)

Gordon Kahl was not the only person to die on that day at the hands of government "lawmen." According to Aid & Abet Police & Military Newsletter, (AAPMN), Sheriff Gene Matthews was also murdered by the corrupt agents. (2)

The above horrific event took place in Arkansas, where Kahl had fled following his earlier February ambush by unidentified government agents, an ambush that culminated in a shootout between Kahl and the agents. The June day above, for Kahl, was his final day of torment at the hands of the U.S. government, and it came after many years of government harassment of the Kahl family. The harassment began after it became clear that Gordon Kahl apparently "knew too much" about the government and the direction in which it was slowly and quietly marching.

Kahl first opted out of the Social Security program in 1968 after studying communism and reading the Communist Manifesto. He discovered that the "heavy progressive or graduated income tax," was the second plank of the Communist Manifesto. The fifth plank of the Communist Manifesto had already been set into motion in 1913, with the establishment of the "federal" reserve, which is a privately owned, central banking monopoly. (3)

Communism, however, was against his moral principles of Gordon Kahl, and against his religious beliefs, as well. According to his wife, Joan, Gordon notified the government in a letter addressed to "The Synagogue of Satan" that he was removing his family and himself from the SS program. He wrote that he was not going to pay into this socialist program, and he did not desire to receive services from it. Indeed, Gordon-and everyone else-had an option of opting out, because the Social Security program was established as a socialist-or voluntary-redistribution of wealth. But socialism is only a very short step away from full-blown communism, which is an involuntary redistribution of wealth and property, against the will of the people.

It was when Kahl began educating other farmers and then went on television in west Texas that the government took notice, and then took steps to silence him. Kahl was well-liked in his community. He was highly respected as an honest, honorable and principled man. He told the truth, and people listened. After his first local television program, at least 200 workers quickly filed W4 exemption forms that blocked employers from withholding income taxes. According to the documentary about the Kahl family, "Death and Taxes," an IRS spokesperson stated that the IRS targets outspoken people like Kahl for prosecution, and they make examples of them.

Shortly after Kahl's public programs, and despite the fact that Gordon Kahl did not make enough money to even owe taxes, he was placed on trial. He was tried and charged under Title 26, 7203 (willful failure to file), but he was sentenced for "income tax evasion," which was Title 18. The judge, who refused to hear any arguments based upon the Constitution or upon Kahl's personal convictions or religious beliefs, sentenced Gordon to one year in prison, which Gordon served in Leavenworth. This would be followed by five years of probation.

After serving the sentence in Leavenworth, Gordon was released and ordered to report regularly to his probation officer. By this time, Gordon had moved back to North Dakota. He had been forced into retirement at this point. Just after April 15th of that first year of probation, the government noticed that Gordon had again not "complied." He had not filed his voluntary income tax return. When the agents approached him, Gordon told them he would never fill out another income tax return form as long as he lived, and he told the federal agents who came out to the farm, "I want to be left alone." According to his wife, Joan, Gordon said, "I'm not giving government anything, I'm not taking anything from government. We are self-sustaining."

The government then placed a lien on approximately 40 acres that belonged to the Kahls, and the Kahl family would now feel the lashes of the first, the third, the fourth and the ninth planks of the Communist Manifesto. Gordon filed a motion against this lien, but according to the Chronology transcript of the Taos Land and Film Company, the motion was confiscated by government agents and never reached the courts. An auction was then held. It was around this time that Gordon began to feel that the government was not going to stop its harassment of him short of killing him. The government of the United States, he believed, was never going to leave him and his family alone. (4)

In 1980, a warrant for Gordon's arrest was issued on the grounds that he had failed to file an income tax return. This warrant was later rescinded, perhaps in part because no law can actually be found requiring Gordon to file an income tax return. In early 1981, a different arrest warrant was issued, this time because the federal judge in Texas wanted Kahl returned to his court for another hearing. The U.S. Marshals Field Report indicated the judge was "in no hurry," and was demanding that Kahl be returned to Texas partly to demonstrate the ability of federal power to cross state lines, and thus counter statements Kahl had made. According to AAPMN, in July of 1981, however, with Gordon still free and the warrant still not served on him, Deputy Director John Twomey of the U.S. Marshals headquarters in Washington, D.C., instructed newly appointed North Dakota Marshal, Ken Muir, to put the matter away and not spend any more time or resources trying to serve the misdemeanor warrant on Gordon Kahl.

Gordon continued setting up town meetings and explaining to the other farmers why and how the government was now taking their farms away from them. Many of the farmers had paid millions of dollars for their farms, but they still did not own their farms because those payments were only paying interest to the banks. Many had lost their farms as a result of the U.S. farm policy that benefited large, aggressive, army-like agribusiness companies over smaller, family farmers, and as this took place, the entire farming community began feeling the effects of the eighth plank of the Communist Manifesto. The objective of the farmers trying to keep their land, therefore, was to try to establish local or "township government," according to the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which would curb the federal expansionist powers that were threatening to take over their land, as well as take over every other aspect of their lives as individuals.

On February 13, 1983, in anticipation of one of Gordon Kahl's township meetings, Marshal Muir and a number of other law enforcement personnel elected to ignore Deputy Director John Twomey's 1981 instructions against serving the misdemeanor warrant on Gordon Kahl. According to the Affidavit of Criminal Justice Professionals, an independent group of professional criminal investigators, "Federal officers violated orders from Washington headquarters." The lawmen not only violated direct orders, but they also violated professional law enforcement procedure to the point that their actions led to an unnecessary and deadly-but planned-shootout. The shootout resulted in two dead, and others gravely injured. Among the most gravely injured was Gordon's 23-year-old son, Yorie. (5)

As the Kahl family, including Gordon, Joan, and Yorie, emerged from the township meeting with their friends, they noticed someone watching them with binoculars down the street in an unmarked pickup truck. Yorie and friend Scott Faul felt uncomfortable about the situation, but Gordon did not. Gordon's intent was to simply drive home.

Yorie spoke privately with his father, however, and as a safety precaution to protect his father, they switched jackets, and Yorie donned Gordon's cap.

The two cars containing the Kahls and friends proceeded on toward the Kahl farm. After driving over the summit of a hill, however, they suddenly saw that there was a roadblock ahead consisting of plain, unmarked vehicles. They did not know the identities of those in the vehicles, or why they were blocking the road ahead, and they made an attempt to pull into a driveway in order to turn around. At this time, however, an unmarked Ram Charger was seen speeding toward them from behind.

Blocked now from advancing or retreating, the people riding in the two Kahl cars discovered they were now being ambushed by carloads of unidentified strangers with rifles pointed at them through opened car windows.

At this point, all of the drivers of all cars stopped, and the men began emerging from their vehicles. The unidentified assailants were all armed. One man was armed with a riot shotgun. According to several witnesses, the men in the unmarked ambush vehicles began screaming obscenities at the Kahls, who still did not know who these men were or why the two Kahl cars had just been ambushed by them. "You're going to die," the men screamed, "we're going to blow your f***ing heads off." This went on for several minutes. "You're going to die, you're going to die."

"They were laughing," Yorie said, and he stated that one man "looked like something that just crawled out from under a bridge. He had long hair, a long beard, he was wearing a black leather jackethe looked like something you'd expect to jump off a Harley."

"I remember Scott Faul saying to me," Yorie continued, "'what in the hell is this?' and I said, 'I don't know, Scott. I'm getting my gun, I'm getting out.'" Yorie instructed his mother, Joan, to lie down on the floorboard inside the vehicle while the men went outside to try and determine what was happening. At this point, Yorie, Gordon and Scott got out of their cars carrying their weapons. (6)

"I didn't know who they were," Yorie would later state, "I didn't even know how many of them there were." Yorie took shelter behind a telephone pole and prepared to try to defend himself, his family and his friends.

According to one of the witnesses, one of the unidentified men slammed his rifle down hard on the hood of his car making a loud noise resembling a gunshot. Everyone apparently thought a shot had been fired, and this, the witness said, triggered the gun battle between the still unidentified assailants and their targets.

Yorie was immediately gunned down. He was shot in the abdomen with a shotgun, and then shot in the arm and right hand. He thought his arm had been blown off. He fell into the melting snow and mud completely incapacitated, and listened to the gun battle that then took place. When the shooting stopped, Yorie did not know if any members of his family or friends were still alive because he could not see any of the others from where he lay, facedown. "I remember laying there thinking, 'gee whiz, all of us just got wiped out.'"

Killed in the battle were Marshals Muir and Cheshire. According to another Taos Land and Film interview transcript, attorney William Kennelly, (Scott Faul's first lawyer, now deceased), stated it was Marshal Cheshire who accidentally shot and killed Marshal Muir. The interview states, "I think the ballistics evidence is just simply overwhelming, that it was Cheshire who shot. Muir only got hit with one shot. And I think it was very clear to me that it was Cheshire's bullet, because he was the only one shooting that kind of bullet." (7)

Injured in the battle were three other officers, one reportedly injured by a piece of ricocheting asphalt that entered his head through his ear, and another who would later give what has now been found to be false testimony while under oath during the trial of Yorie and Scott. Although this officer was clean-cut for the trial, this was the man who looked like a biker wearing the black leather jacket at the time of the ambush. This officer stated under oath that Yorie shot his finger off. Recently discovered medical evidence that was withheld during the trial, however, does not support this. The medical records indicate that this officer was, like Marshal Muir, also hit by fire from his own men. His wounds were caused by "pellets" fired by the shotgun of one of his fellow officers. Yorie was not carrying a shotgun. He was carrying his Mini-14, which would have discharged bullets, not pellets. (8) (9)

When the shootout was over, Yorie was near death. Scott and Gordon pulled Yorie into a vehicle and then drove him to a nearby medical clinic. After dropping Yorie off, Gordon later left town and fled to Arkansas. He fled because he knew beyond a doubt now that the government agents had no intention of arresting him. There would be no more trials for Gordon, no further juries and there would be no justice for this man. He knew now that he would be executed on sight.

Yorie lost his right kidney, his gallbladder, suffered severe liver lacerations, a lung laceration, and also lost a portion of his intestines. It was not certain at first if he would even survive his injuries, but when he did survive, he was then subjected to a trial without appropriate counsel. The first lawyer hired for Yorie, Gerald LaFountain of Montana, was in fact apprehended at the North Dakota state line, and then duly harassed by state and federal "lawmen" until he, too, was forced to flee North Dakota in order to protect himself. The lawmen who did this were operating under the sixth plank of the Communist Manifesto. LaFountain was refused permission to see or speak to Yorie, his client. LaFountain filed a sworn affidavit regarding this violation of Yorie's rights through the law firm of former Senator, John DeCamp.

Despite the fact that Yorie and the others who were ambushed by unidentified, plain-clothed assailants were clearly acting in self-defense on that day, despite the fact that Yorie was completely incapacitated by gunshot wounds from the very first moments of the gun battle that was planned by the assailants, despite the fact that there was evidence indicating "friendly fire" was the cause of a large portion of this tragedy that was deliberately created by "lawmen" using confusion and mayhem to create terror, and despite the fact that Yorie was denied access to his hired attorney, Yorie stood trial and was charged and convicted on two counts of second degree murder, as well as injuring the other officers. Yorie is innocent of all of these charges.

No one has ever been charged with injuring Yorie. No one has ever been charged with dismembering and murdering his father.

Yorie was sentenced to two life sentences, plus fifteen years.

At this time, Yorie has now been in federal prison for almost 24 years. He is an innocent, political prisoner who has been repeatedly denied his rights. Similar to the situation of his father, the federal government is still not finished with Yorie Kahl. He has already spent most of his entire adult life in prison for crimes he did not commit, and unless Americans wake up and take this country back from the communists now secretly running things, this decent man will spend perhaps the rest of his life in prison. But, it will not stop there. If Americans do not wake up and pay close attention to everything that has happened to the Kahl family, then any one of us can expect to be selected as the next targeted "example" of a government that is completely out of control, illegal, and very dangerous. History will continue to repeat itself in an escalating fashion unless we learn from it, and learn well. The pattern of murderous corruption will not stop unless we stop it, and correct it and return this government to the only true law of the land, the U.S. Constitution.

The murder of Gordon Kahl appears to have been a heralding point that brought about a new age of communistic police force in the United States. The police state occurred because no one did anything to counter it. Something strange began to happen after Gordon was executed. His murderers got away with everything, and this seems to have set the stage for what then happened at Ruby Ridge. Unfortunately, we never learned the details about Gordon until many years later, because we only heard about him through the state-controlled media that spread only state-sponsored propaganda. This media falsely presented Gordon as a dangerous madman, and it presented the "lawmen" as heroes who were only doing their jobs. We would not learn that this was all a complete fabrication until many years later.

The stage was then set for Ruby Ridge to occur, in which a young mother was deliberately gunned down by a government agent. The mother was holding her baby in her arms when she was shot. We were lied to again, and we believed the lie, just as we believed the lie about Gordon, and the lie about Pearl Harbor many years earlier.

Now even more boldly out of control, the government then brought about the Waco Massacre. In this travesty, approximately 80 people-a third of whom were infants and children-were, according to tapes and transcripts, gunned down, tortured and burned alive by government agents and the military Delta Force. We now know that the government lied to us about the events of Waco, as well. One must wonder if we had stopped the pattern and demanded prison sentences for those who lied, if we might have avoided Oklahoma and 9/11. The events of 9/11 now stand as the "new Pearl Harbor" for the Project for the New American Century. (10)

We have now reached a point of critical mass, and we had better stop the escalating pattern of police and military violence here and now.

We had better stop allowing liars and murderers to go free simply because they are "agents" or "officers," or high ranking politicians, while innocent Americans are being murdered or having their lives otherwise destroyed by a corrupt and arrogant system that has no conscience. We do not need "panels" or "commissions" of congressmen convened when mass murders or an assassination has been committed. We do not need government examining government. We need independent, professional criminal investigators to handle such criminal cases. And then, we need to listen to those professional investigators. We need to see that arrests are made and criminals are brought to justice. We need to watch trial proceedings closely, and if we see that a single judge is not upholding his or her oath to protect the Constitution, then we must assume they are upholding the manifesto of something else. They must be removed from office.

It is time for us to strike down the Communist Manifesto and its rules calling for abolition of property rights, confiscation by the state and redistribution of wealth against our will. At this time, we are also beginning to see a strange blurring of our country's borders taking place. This is the ninth plank of the Communist Manifesto. The tenth plank is free public schools for children. In this plank, the children of a country taken over by communism will receive a government-approved education. As we now know, the public education now being received in the United States is equal to an abysmal education.

While we have been asleep as a nation, and assuming that our human rights and civil liberties were being protected under the Constitution, the Constitution has been swept away and all ten planks of the Communist Manifesto have been established in its place. (11)

We must now either take this country back, or be content to sit back and allow a communist police state to act as judge, jury and executioner for anyone targeted.

Every American needs to become familiar with the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. We cannot uphold the Constitution of the United States and also support a government that is based upon the harsh and impersonal mandates of communism. We need to dismantle the Communist Manifesto that is now being followed in various federal agencies, and embrace, again, the Constitution, just as Gordon Kahl once bravely tried to explain to us.

America and even the Constitution of the United States now owe a great debt to the Kahl family for all they have endured and unwaveringly stood for. They have bravely refused the demands of an unlawful government, even in the face of great personal loss.

This country was established as a Constitutional Republic-not a democracy-as many, including the president, apparently think. A democracy is mob rule. This country was a Constitutional Republic, a unique governing entity in which the government served as servant to the people, and people ruled the government with their opinions. We need to reestablish our Constitutional Republic. The first steps in doing so are in studying the Constitution and Bill of Rights, which are no longer being taught in the free public schools. The other important step is in acknowledging the debt we owe to the Kahl family. We need to demand freedom for Yorie. We need to demand that he be given the freedom, justice, and liberty that his father died for as he tried to preserve those rights for Americans while the rest of the nation was asleep.

We need to bring to justice those actually responsible for the murders that Yorie was falsely and haughtily charged with, and then we need to bring others operating within this so-called government and police state to justice, as well. We need to see prison terms for "agents" who dare to lie while under oath, and prison terms for others who fail to uphold their oaths to defend the Constitution.

But first of all-first of all-we need to give Yorie Kahl, an innocent man, back to his family. In fact, we need to give him back to America. Yorie had a teacher who was a very wise man, and America now needs wise teachers more than ever. (12)

------------

THE TEN PLANKS OF THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO.

(Walk these planks at your own risk.)

"These measures will of course be different in different countries. Nevertheless in the most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production" (11)

--------------------------------

Mary Sparrowdancer is a writer and book author. Her book, "The Love Song of the Universe," was the #2 Bestseller at her former publisher's house, and it sold out three times during 2006. She is about to put the book back into print, and is also about to publish a new Special Edition, with many updates.

------------------------------

References:

1. "Death and Taxes," documentary film production featuring the Kahl family. 1993. Produced by Taos Land and Film Company. (2007.)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7020741932984905397&q=death+and+taxes&hl=en

2. Aid & Abet Police & Military Newsletter, spring, 2003. (2007)

http://www.yorievonkahl.com/Aid%20&%20Abet.htm

3. "America: Freedom to Fascism," documentary film by acclaimed producer, Aaron Russo, who has graciously permitted it to be viewed freely in an effort to educate the public. Learn how Congress illegally turned the coinage and regulation of money over to a central bank monopoly; learn the truth about the tax laws, and much more. The DVD of this film should be in every home in the U.S. (2007)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-43127302

77175242198&q=America+freedom&hl=en

4. Typed transcript by Taos Land and Film Company. (2007)

http://www.taoslandandfilm.com/CHRONOLOGY.html

5. Affidavit of professional, independent investigation of the Medina Shootout.

(2007)

http://www.yorievonkahl.com/Jack%20Mclamb%20affidavit%20of%20criminal.htm

6. Yorie Kahl, typed transcript by Taos Land and Film Company. (2007)

http://www.taoslandandfilm.com/Yorie.html

7. William Kennelly, typed transcript by Taos Land and Film Company. 2007.

http://www.taoslandandfilm.com/Kennelly.html

8. Bismarck Tribune: Tony Spilde, "Changing Lives in 30 Seconds," undated. 2007. http://www.bismarcktribune.com/series/kahl/

9. Motion filed by Barry Bachrach, Esq., Yorie's attorney. Motion asks that a Habeas petition be reviewed due to newly discovered evidence that a "key witness lied on the stand." 2006. (2007)

http://www.yorievonkahl.com/media_advisory%201-17-2006.htm

10. Phone calls from Waco victims to 911 frantically reporting they were under attack by unknown assailants. They asked 911 to "call this off," since there were so many women and children within the compound. Gunshots coming from the federal agents can be heard throughout the calls. 2007.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8808439217729437

398&q=waco+911calls&hl=en

11. Communist Manifesto, (2007)

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/treatise/communist_manifesto/mancont.htm

12. Police activities in America since the murder of Gordon Kahl. (2007)

http://political-resources.com/misc/police-state.htm

William Wagener interviews Rod Class

2010-05-08T22:02:00.003-04:00

AIB RADIO

RADIO FREE AMERICA

ARTICLES OF FREEDOM

2010-04-18T12:19:00.001-04:00

Charles Pixley: a Real American (Written 08/17/98)

2010-03-29T18:02:00.002-04:00

Charles Pixley was recently released from a federal prison camp outside of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. His crime? He had made available to the American public knowledge of and access to 714X, a homeopathic camphor compound which is available to the Canadian public and is regarded as a highly successful therapy against cancer. After a lengthy court battle, which left him financially ruined, Pixley was sentenced to nineteen years in federal prison.

Even though he is a medical layman, Pixley's story is similar to that of other scientists and physicians who sought to defeat disease outside the accepted conventions of orthodox medicine. The faces and names change, but the story is the same. A physician, scientist or researcher seeks to develop or make available a treatment for cancer or some other deadly disease. These are sought out by patients who are in the advanced stages of their disease, whose bank accounts have been drained by the medical establishment, and who despair of finding a cure in those realms. As alternatives to the established therapies are presented to them, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sweeps in, seizing research materials, patient lists and all assets in a fit of Gestapo-like fury. Professional and financial ruin and sometimes incarceration are all that is left for those who make treatment alternatives available to the ill.

This was the experience of Charles Pixley. In 1989 microbiologist Gaston Naessens was acquitted of charges in Canada that he contributed to the death of a terminal cancer patient he had introduced to 714X. After that momentous three-year court battle, Naessens' camphor-based compound was made available for legal prescription by the Canadian Department of Health and Welfare. According to Pixley, it has since been used with varying but significant degrees of success by over 100,000 terminal cancer patients without one instance of side effect. It is also inexpensive.

Leonard Saye; a "freeman" or a feudal "felon"?

2010-02-10T20:12:00.010-05:00

In 1996 plain clothes FBI agents invaded the home of Leonard Saye and accused him of being a 'freeman'. The actions of these agents beg the questions:

Who had promulgated laws against being a 'freeman'? Aren't laws that penalize 'freemen' actually "bills of attainder"?

If a "free" man or woman whose actuarial potential for labor had been bundled and bonded from birth to be issued in Federal Reserve coinage and promissory notes is not the beneficiary to their own account(s), Treasury or otherwise, who then is authorized to access a "free" persons account(s)?

If someone other than us, the supposedly "free" people who have funded the United States' current monetary system with our labor, are not beneficiaries to our own credits and debits, where is the truth of the stipulations of this contract? (See below, FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK) Is not a contract that lacks full disclosure of its adhesive nature unconscionable?

Click here to understand the impact this FBI raid had on Leonard Saye's family.

Read the following article "FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECK" from the April 19, 1937 issue of The Scranton Times to better understand who profits from the printing of money.

Washington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history."

Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return.

"If a burglar had a license to steal, he said, "he would at least have to carry away his loot. The federal reserve system has its loot brought to it."

Lamneck said this was a procedure for a "steal" authorized by congress.

The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars.

Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300. He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury.

He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.

So, Where was the Sheriff of Clark County, Nevada when this crime against a "free" man (Leonard Saye) was being perpetrated?

Why are responsible "free" men and women being criminalized for using their own Treasury accounts to satisfy other creditors and eliminate their own portion of the national debt?

ARTICLES OF FREEDOM

2010-01-06T22:16:00.005-05:00

This Irredentist's Controversy

2010-01-05T08:30:00.019-05:00

To the left is a copy of an "ORDER" (06-SA-64, . . . ) that appears to be crafted directly from Chapter 9 of Ashley S. Lipson's training manual for attorneys, Guerrilla Discovery. (For the definition of Guerrilla, click here.) The order was imposed by Lackawanna County (PA) Court of Common Pleas Judge, Barrasse inconsistent with the Court of Common Pleas Local Rules 128 and 130, and without showing "good cause" with regard to its "relevance" to the "controversy" before him.

It is apparent that Judge Barrasse had not considered section 9.54 of Lipson's manual wherein it lists 16 grounds for "Objecting to the Examination" and includes Justice Douglas' landmark decision in Schlagenhauf v. Holder, i.e.; "And a doctor for a fee can easily discover something wrong with any patient . . . ".

Rather than simply stating the validity of the remaining six (6) charges that were predicated on the primary charges previously acquitted by Judge Geroulo on August 31, 2006 (see "ORDER" 06 S 64 to the right), Judge Barrasse had me imprisoned for four (4) days in the Lackawanna County Prison and on 7/8/2008 Judge Barrasse waived the fines and costs that was always within his power to waive, and on 1/13/2009, in a stealth move, simply swept the whole matter "under the rug" by falsifying the records with a "Penalty Satisfied" so that the casual observer would presume that I had participated in his decision. (See Trezevant v. City of Tampa 741 F.2d 336.)

Like Judges Sean McGraw and Vito Geroulo, Judge Barrasse (again) ignored both lawful and legal basic rules of procedure to examine the substantive evidence presented and require statutory claim to the contrary. By way of a Petition for Review I ask(ed) only that the court render right ruling consistent with the Oath of Office that they and their predecessors had taken. Offset of each charge is - and has been - conditioned upon substantive statutory proof of the validity of each of the instant claims.

It is becoming increasingly evident that the United States' and its governments have become occupied by a power foreign to the American People. Absent any proof to the contrary, I have come to believe that members of the Democrat and Republican parties are duty bound to legislate 13th Amendment 'voluntary servitude' on behalf of the owners of the Federal Reserve. The laws that they make are promulgated to 'duly convict of crime' any American who chooses not to volunteer their property and labor into the jurisdiction of this oligarchy of plutocrats.

So I ask:

1. Because a duly authorized Title 4 U.S.C., Section 1, 2, 3 American Flag - the flag to which I pledged my allegiance - was captured and not returned by City of Wilkes-Barre (PA) police on February 24, 2005 and City of Carbondale police on February 1, 2006; Are municipal police officers violating their oaths of office when they willfully collude with the seditious guerrilla activities of a belligerent occupying power? Or, Are municipal officers/agents "in fact" the willing hirelings of a belligerent occupying power? Is the prison system in the U.S. essentially a gulag?

2. Because each and every Federal Reserve note is 'debt based' and conditional upon the 'good faith and credit of the American People' (including me); How can any American be compelled to pay an alleged "debt" with a Federal Reserve created 'debt instrument' to which they, the American People, themselves are the Creditor, i.e., the "holder in due course"? Have judges acquiesced to legislated doublespeak (and peer pressure) that was designed to entrap American men and women into statutory "peonage" in which, if they do not comply voluntarily, they can be held "in contempt of court" and condemned to debtors prison?

3. Is there no judge or legislator who will 'stand in the gap' on behalf of an American who, as a matter of conscious, refuses to acquiesce his or her property and/or labor to a foreign power? Or, have all become puppets of a belligerent occupying power?
See U.S. Army's Field Manual 27-10, The Law of Land Warfare

4. And, finally, shouldn't judges and legislators, who have been elected to preserve and defend the unalienable economic and property Rights of the people they were elected to serve, care that the Clerk of the Courts for Lackawanna County is not even in Pennsylvania? That the Clerk of the Courts for Lackawanna County is located in New York; a jurisdiction foreign to Pennsylvania?

See also pages 184 - 185 of the 1906 book, History: the First national bank of Scranton, Pa, for "a matter of general local knowledge" regarding the Scranton family and their company ownership of private properties from Forest City to Scranton, Pennsylvania.

Mary Connors, loving daughter of Grace Connors

2009-12-04T19:48:00.006-05:00

News Article on Wrongful State Guardianship

Woman: Mom’s wishes ignored
Daughter questions guardian change by judge
By JENNIFER LEARN-ANDES jandes@leader.net

Grace Connors executed paperwork in September 1990 to make her only surviving daughter, Mary Connors, her durable power of attorney – the person who would manage her life, legal matters and finances if she could no longer do so.

Her wish is not being honored.

The 84-year-old West Pittston native now suffers dementia, and a Luzerne County judge has named a different guardian – the Family Service Association of Wyoming Valley.

Mary Claire Connors and her legal representative – the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia – say the court had no authority or justification to appoint a different guardian, and they filed legal action this week to force the county to reinstate Mary’s durable power of attorney and end the association’s guardianship.

“Mrs. Connors’ plain and bindingly expressed wishes, required under law to govern here, have been systematically disrespected, ignored, disregarded and trampled,” wrote lawyer Thomas K. Gilhool.

Mary Connors said “anger is just oozing out of me.”

“If these durable powers of attorney are being ignored, why advocate that people get them?” said Connors, who recently attended a county commissioners meeting to publicly urge county officials to watch her case and others.

The not-for-profit Public Interest Law Center helps people who can’t afford lawyers fight to get all levels of government to “do right by the public, especially the weakest and most vulnerable citizens.”

Gilhool presented the following details in his filing:
Grace, a lifelong West Pittston resident, had a U.S. Postal Service pension left by her late husband and a long-term care insurance policy.

Her attorney, Veronica Kisailus, testified in guardianship proceedings that Grace asked her to prepare a durable power of attorney in 1990. Kisailus said she explained in detail what it meant and Grace signed the action. Kisailus testified that Grace “gave every evidence of being of sound mind and judgment.”

The county’s Area Agency on Aging initiated the change in guardianship in 2001.
Grace had been visiting Mary in August 2001 in Santa Rosa, Calif. Mary Connors reported that her mother had been unlawfully removed by her adoptive niece from an Alzheimer’s day program there and brought to Pennsylvania without Mary’s knowledge or consent.

Around that time, Grace passed a note to a longtime West Pittston next-door neighbor, asking the neighbor to please get her out of the adoptive niece’s farmhouse, where she had been moved. The neighbor gave the note to the West Pittston police, which turned it over to the Agency on Aging.

In November 2001, county Judge Chester Muroski appointed the Family Service Association as temporary emergency guardian and later guardian “until further order of this court.”

Mary has argued in court that nobody has presented any evidence, proof or good cause showing why the power of attorney should be disqualified. The law requires evidence of “good cause or disqualification” before another guardian can be named, Gilhool said, adding that Mary must also be given a chance to refute any claims.

Gilhool said the Sept. 17, 1990, durable power of attorney was in “full force and effect,” making the other guardianship “unlawful, invalid, void and voidable.”
The Agency on Aging has cited allegations from both “sides” regarding “exploitation of Mrs. Connors’ assets.”

Gilhool said Mary gave the court complete records of the bank account and other transactions throughout the period of her durable power. The other “side” produced incomplete records that, if investigated, “would have shown a very substantial and unaccountable withdrawal from the then recently established joint account by the other ‘side,’” he wrote.

Grace was placed in a facility, where she has been for nearly five years, the action says.

County Public Information Officer Kathy Bozinski said the county can’t comment on pending litigation, and background information on guardianships would likely be confidential anyway.

Mary moved back to the family home in West Pittston, though she said it’s in foreclosure proceedings and the county is trying to liquidate it to pay the nursing home that she does not want her mother in. She said she wants her mother to live with her with assistance from providers that come into the home. People must wake up and realize the same thing can happen to them, she said.

“I want to show the public that the trust they have in the system can be violated. They can’t depend on their advance directives being followed,” she said.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jennifer Learn-Andes, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 831-7333.
- - - - - - - - - - - -

"The more men have to lose, the less willing are they to venture. The rich are in general slaves to fear, and submit to courtly power with the trembling duplicity of a spaniel." - Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" - 1776

The American Form of Government

2009-12-03T21:44:00.001-05:00

The Sheriff Project.

Sherry Peel Jackson: An Open Letter to Her Congressman

2009-12-02T17:31:00.003-05:00

Dear Congressman Johnson

I am Sherry Peel Jackson, your former CPA. I am writing you because I am concerned about my health and my life. Prior to becoming a political prisoner I was the picture of health. In late June, 2009 I started experiencing a rapid heart beat on an irregular basis.

Since this had happened infrequently in the past I did not think much of it. However, in Mid July it started happening on a regular basis and I became concerned. I went to the medical staff twice in Mid July only to be given a one-minute EKG test and powerful meds without proper diagnosis. I did not take them because I had not been seen by a specialist. One week later, on July 21 at 12:45am I left the dorm in flip flops to go tell the officers that I was having a heart attack. The officers on duty called the ambulance and the ambulance checked my heart on their portable EKG machine. It was beating at 150 beats per minute. They took me to Leesberg (spelling) hospital where I remained until Friday, July 24th at 11:30pm. During the hospital stay it was determined that my heart was healthy but my thyroid was producing too much hormone, thus speeding up my heart.

This is called hyperthyroidism or Graves disease. I was given two medications by the hospital - Methimazole, which is an anti-thyroid agent used to reduce the amount of thyroid hormone produced by the body and Metoprolol, which is a beta blocker used to slow the heart.

The hospital doctor told me that in four weeks (approximately August 21) the prison medical unit was to do blood tests to determine how the thyroid medication was affecting my body.

The blood test was taken in late August and I was told that I would be placed on the appointment schedule to come over and review the results. I was never called. I went over in early September and inquired of Dr. DeLeon as to how to get blood test results. He told me to put in a request to staff, so I did that on September 15th. It simply asked to see the results of the tests.

Sometime after September 23rd I received a response in writing, from Ms. Marich, that stated that I could either make a sick call (come over early in the morning wait in line and fill out forms) or come to Open House to see the results. Open house is held only on Thursdays from 3:00pm to 3:30pm. I went to Open House Thursday September 30th and was told by Ms. Marich that she could not find the results! I watched her look through and around several piles of folders in her office but at no time did she look on a computer for them. She told me to check back later. On Wednesday October 28th I passed out around 4pm and was taken to medical and cleared.

On Friday October 30th my lips started turning black as if I had been a lifelong smoker. By Sunday November 1st my lips were fully black.

My boss, the Chaplain, called medical and a male nurse was sent over from the medium security men's prison on this complex (there are two maximum security, one medium security and one low security men's prisons on this complex with the women's camp). He took my blood pressure and oxygen and said there was nothing else he could do. He told me to go to sick call Monday morning, which I did.

I showed Mr. Coucho my lips and told him that something was wrong with my blood, I could tell. (I am leaving out gross details here).

He said I would be put on the schedule. However, the very next day, Tuesday morning, November 3rd, I found blood in my stool and rushed over to medical because I am smart enough to know that this is a major problem. I was chewed out for coming over to medical without a staff member telling me to come. I told Charlie, the female nurse and Mr. Coucho the PA that I was in the hospital in July, never got the blood work results and something was terribly wrong.

I am 46 years old and I know my body! I finally convinced them that I was not playing and was not stupid, so they 'treated' me with a packet for a stool sample test. Mr. Coucho looked on the computer for the blood test results from August and found them there!

The blood test showed a problem with the thyroid way back then!

He said I would be put on the schedule for new blood work later that week because these results were too old. He had a short conversation with Dr. DeLeon in Spanish and then said the thyroid count was off.

This was November 3rd. I administered the stool tests and returned them to Nurse Charlie on Friday November 6th.

Today is November 26th, Thanksgiving. I have not received the results of the stool test. I have not been given any new blood test.

My neck is swelling up like a blow fish and I am having trouble talking. I have been feeling very ill for the last two weeks.

Congressman, I don't want them to kill me in here. As you well know, I am being punished for exposing government fraud. However, millions of people don't file tax returns and I was just used as an example by the DOJ for their new program called the Tax Defiers Initiative.

I have a wonderful husband and two beautiful children. I have already spent 21 months in prison for a non crime, and I refuse to come out dead or maimed for life. I have not caused these people any problems. This is no threat but just for your information.

I also wrote the warden today. Things can't go on this way as I languish in here for someone's political gain. God doesn't like ugly and He is the ultimate judge and vindicator.

Sherry Peel Jackson 59085-019
FCI COLEMAN MEDIUM
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
P.O. BOX 1032
COLEMAN, FL 33521

Debby Rabold for her son Aaron Daniel

2009-11-22T19:24:00.008-05:00

Debby Rabold

P.O. Box 451 - Effort, Pennsylvania
570-872-6945 - FreeAaronRabold@aol.com

The Hon. US Senator Arlen Specter
The Federal Building, 11th Floor
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

Monday, April 27, 2009 @ The Capitol Rotunda in Harrisburg

An OPEN LETTER - to Pennsylvania’s Senior US Senator Arlen Specter

Subject: Judicial Corruption … Malicious Prosecution, Wrongful Convictions, Alarming Prison Population and Overcrowding, and Inmate Abuse

Senator Specter: I have visited your Scranton and Harrisburg offices on numerous occasions over the last couple of years, and attended a town meeting you had held in Stroudsburg/Monroe County, Pennsylvania. I have spoken with your staff members and have given them copies of documents that I had filed in Federal Court … as well as had provided copies, thereof, to The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, including in-depth reports with supportive documents submitted to The Pennsylvania Board of Pardons.

The issues that are raised in those documents and in my conversations with your staff members concern:

1) The high … and continually growing prison population in Pennsylvania,

2) Malicious Prosecutions … subsequently resulting in Wrongful Convictions,

3) The violation of Constitutional and Civil Rights by The Courts and its Officers,

4) The abuse of prison inmates … and,

5) Evidence that counties within northeastern Pennsylvania [Monroe, Luzerne, Carbon, Lackawanna, Schuylkill, and others] have clearly been operating in blatant violation of: Federal RICO Statutes … and furthermore, are constantly bringing about Wrongful Convictions on our helpless law-abiding citizenry.

Especially outrageous are the assaults upon the disabled, as in the case of my autistic son, Aaron Daniel Rabold, who was maliciously prosecuted and wrongfully convicted in Monroe County without any evidence to suggest that he was involved in the incident at-issue. He was never tried for committing a criminal act – but rather, as to whether he was mentally ill or legally insane.

He was neither. He suffers from: Autism Spectrum Disorder – which is a biological and neurological disorder. Furthermore: All of the evidence directly relative to the specific alleged incident at-issue was clearly exculpatory, and subsequently was withheld from the jury.

My son, Aaron was incarcerated for over two years before going to his sham: Show-Trial, as his Public Defender filed continuance after continuance. My son had made a conscious decision NOT to waive his Rule 600 [Right to Speedy Trial].

His public defender intentionally signed the waiver without my son’s knowledge, nor his consent.
My son was sentenced to fourteen to twenty-eight years in state prison. He has been incarcerated since March 13, 2003 – [now over six years]. For two of those six years he was completely cut off from any contact with his family and the outside world, as he was unable to put anybody on his visitor list, and the prison personnel would not help him.

He is presently being held at SCI Waymart. He is emaciated due to his severe digestive disorders. He is very over-medicated and suffering the life-threatening side effects of that medication, and resembles a typical inmate held at a Nazi Concentration Camp - or recently, such a camp in the former Yugoslavia.

He has been sexually assaulted, beaten, and tortured [with electricity]. This had occurred at various State Correctional Institutions in Pennsylvania. He has been held at five State Correctional Institutions, plus the depraved Monroe County Correctional Facility -- which has rightfully earned a reputation for sexual abuse by the guards, as well as far too many other indiscretions to begin addressing right now.

It is my understanding that you have joined: US Senator Webb [from Virginia] in addressing the appalling rate of imprisonment in our country. This high rate is definitely not due to any overwhelming rate of actual criminal activity, except, of course, by members of the judiciary, et al -- as has been clearly demonstrated by the outrageous and well-covered incident which finally had been identified in Luzerne County regarding the atrocities which were committed by: Judges Ciavarella and Conahan.

If a preliminary investigation was ever dared to be carried out in other counties – specifically in Monroe, Lackawanna, Schuylkill, and Carbon – there would be no doubt, whatsoever, that many other violations of the law are regularly being committed by: The Police … District Justices, District Attorneys and their cohorts in-crime [the Public Defenders], as well as the County Judges.

Some information about this situation may be gleaned by reading the documents which I had diligently shared with The Federal Court [Ref: 03: 06 CV 2474 ... 03: 07 CV 2031 ... 03: 08 CV 0445] … as well as the entire folder of documentation docketed with:

The Pennsylvania Board of Pardons … per: Application No.: 23753 [Aaron Daniel Rabold].

Further: On Thursday, April 23, 2009 - I was an eye-witness to an appalling and abominable incident that occurred within The Carbon County Courthouse, where a five-foot, two-inch tall, 120 pound medically fragile woman was assaulted by the deputies, dragged down the hallway and put up against the wall, and threatened with being “cited”.

She was then dragged back down the hallway past the many people who were standing [or sitting] along the walls of the corridor, and forcibly pushed down the stairs toward The Sheriff's Office. She was cited for: “Disorderly Conduct” - subtly taken to a District Justice in Jim Thorpe … who ordered her to prison and set her bail at a whopping $US 20,000.00.

The woman in this instance had not done anything at all. She was quietly standing in the hallway, as were all the rest of us. However, she just happens to be the wife of: Thomas P. Senavitis - the man who has been maliciously accused of causing the accident which took the life of PA Senator James Rhoades.

All of the evidence in the aforementioned case clearly reveals that: Mr. Senavitis is completely innocent of the charges fabricated against him, that he definitely had not left his lane of traffic – meaning, it was Senator Rhoades who was [partly] responsible for causing the accident.

[Partly] - because for some conjecturable reason/s the authorities had been omitting the critical involvement of a third vehicle, driven by a young Argentinean woman - who was evidently responsible for setting-up the conditions that resulted in the violent collision which ultimately resulted in Senator Rhoades’ loss of his life.

Having no evidence to proceed with a legitimate prosecution, and so much prima facie evidence to totally exonerate Mr. Senavitis, both of the PA counties involved: Monroe and Carbon County [possibly at the request of Christopher Hobbs, Esq., a Schuylkill County Public Defender and Senator Rhoades’ son-in-law] knowingly and willfully had used their positions-of-authority to maliciously commit legal abuse and character assassination against the entire law-abiding Senavitis Family.

¿¿¿Where was Mrs. Senavitis’ Public Defender while she was being accosted by the deputies at The Carbon County Courthouse on Thursday, the 23rd of April, 2009??? He had conveniently disappeared.

Senator Specter: We have too many serious problems within our Commonwealth, as well as throughout our entire country. No doubt you must already be fully aware of this fact. It is especially disheartening that these serious problems we now encounter … some being addressed, herein - had been caused by the unethical and criminal acts of selfish political and judicial leaders. It is high time this appalling situation becomes seriously addressed and rectified, rather than covered up by the “good ole boy buddy system”.

Further: The Pennsylvania prisons are over-crowded, and too many inmates are being deprived of a nutritious diet, as well as appropriate medical care. These inmates have been reduced to abject poverty, are physically and psychologically abused by the prison environment, and are evidently being denied their Civil and Human Rights. Additionally, we have an overwhelming rate of:

Wrongfully Convicted Innocent Inmates and those who had received extremely harsh sentences for what were forgivable types of minor offenses. Today’s prison situation in our Commonwealth may aptly be considered as: Modern-Day Slavery – and as well: “Cruel and Unusual Punishment”.

Please take the time to read the documents that I had referred to you, and bring investigations against these corrupt counties in northeastern Pennsylvania – and the illegal, unethical actions of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections.

While I have your attention: I am compelled to bring to your attention that this morning at The Schuylkill County Courthouse in Pottsville, PA - Opening Statements are scheduled in: “Commonwealth v- Piekarsky and Donchak” – two American teenagers who are being maliciously indicted for the death of a fugitive and pedophile [who had impregnated a 14/15-year-old child] … a case where the prime focus has been placed upon this perverted criminal who was illegally residing in Schuylkill County, PA.

Finally: Please do whatever you can to come to the aid of my innocent, gentle, abused, indigent autistic son - and to secure his immediate release from the custody of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania -- while he remains alive. It should go without saying here - that one would now expect you to promptly incite a full-fledged Federal Inquiry into the unforgiving facts which I had just briefly outlined, herein.

Responsibly yours,

Debby Rabold

Eugene Wrona, Claudia and Francesca Montelione, and Kevin Mahoney - Updated 11-19-2009

2009-11-19T12:58:00.001-05:00

From Muncy prison (Inmate #OP5372) Claudia Montelione has requested that corrections and clarification amend Gene Wrona's account of how she, her daughter, Kevin Mahoney and Eugene Wrona were adjudicated to confinement and on-going costly defenses of absurd accusations that were lodged against them by members of the Pennsylvania BAR Association and its Judiciary. Claudia's requested corrections and clarifications have been added in red font. Eugene Wrona's account remains unchanged in italics.

Hello to All from Dauphin County (PA) Prison; Inmate #75041.
October 22, 2009

It appears that I and several others are being held as “political prisoners” because Claudia Montelione has the courage and patriotism to exercise her constitutional rights against a cruel, oppressive and tyrannical government; the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

This humble scribe, Claudia, her daughter Francesca, and an innocent bystander, Kevin Mahoney, have all incurred the wrath of this Commonwealth because Claudia refused to waive her right to due process of Law and other rights before the evil tyrants operating under color of law in Harrisburg, PA, the State Capitol.

At the beginning of this saga, in October of 2007, Claudia, Francesca and Kevin were notary public officers, two commissioned in PA, while Kevin was commissioned in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

It began with an innocent looking demand sent to Claudia from the Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP), an agency under the office of Attorney General Thomas W. Corbett, Jr. His agent, Kathryn H Silcox, an attorney for BCP, demanded that Claudia turn over all her business and notary records for an “investigation” by BCP.

Claudia and Francesca operate(d) a small desktop publishing business, The Penny Pincher Press, in addition to their notary practices.

Claudia responded to Silcox that she would (be happy to) provide the information demanded if BCP would inform her of a complaint and identify the complainant, i.e., comply with her rights to know the nature and cause of the “investigation” by the BCP. She wanted to know if the action was civil or criminal, and whether it was against PPP or against her services as a notary. She has the right to face her accuser, while BCP lacks authority to investigate any business without a formal complaint by a “consumer”.

The Secretary of State issues all commissions to notary publics, so BCP lacks any authority whatsoever to pry into those operations.

Silcox refused to provide fundamental “due process” notice to Claudia and insisted that she has the right to investigate under the Administrative Code of the Commonwealth (also “com.”), which is found in Title 71 of Pa. Statutes. [71 P.S. § 741.951(a)]

Claudia again responded that she has the right to know her accuser and to be informed of any complaints/charges against her. Claudia agreed to comply with BCP demands upon receiving this information.

Silcox, learned in the Law, responded by serving a subpoena on Claudia in Scranton, Lackawanna County, PA. Pa. Rules of Civil Procedure 234.1 prohibits issuing subpoenas without court approval (an order), and a subpoena “may not be used to compel a person to appear or to produce documents or things ex parte before an attorney, a party or a representative of the party.”

Undeterred by the Rules of Court, BCP (Silcox) determined that the Rules do not apply to government agents or agencies, relying on the Administrative Code to overturn Article VI of the U.S. Constitution (supremacy clause) to achieve its ignoble objectives. BCP knew, and Claudia did not, the investigation of Claudia’s records was “criminal” in nature. The subpoena issued under color of Law by BCP attempted an unlawful search and seizure (4th Amendment) and deception to induce self-incrimination (5th Amendment) from Claudia.

Each of Claudia’s responses to BCP was sent “in honor” pursuant to UCC standards. On the other hand, BCP (Silcox) failed to conduct her business in “good faith”, thereby “dishonoring” the implied contract.

Next, BCP filed a motion to compel Claudia to comply with the subpoena. Silcox went “judge-shopping” in Dauphin County, despite Rules of Civil Procedure that dictates Venue in a Lackawanna County court, and Rule 1007 that states “An action may [only] be commenced by filing with the prothonotary (1) a praecipe for a writ of summons, or (2) a complaint.

Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius.

A “Motion to Compel” “Motion for Sanctions” is neither a writ of summons nor a complaint.

Silcox found a sympathetic judge, Lawrence F. Clark, Jr., in Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas (DCCCP).

At this point, BCP has failed to establish jurisdiction in Dauphin County. Nevertheless, DCCCP ordered Claudia to appear before Lawrence Clark, Jr. on March 4, 2008. In a collateral action, Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State ordered her to appear on March 10, 2008, for a review of her practices as a notary public. The Secretary found no evidence of wrong-doing in her notary function. The hearing was to determine if she was engaged in the “unauthorized practice of Law” - alleged to be criminal behavior.

On March 4, 2008, Claudia made a special appearance in DCCCP to raise the question of jurisdiction of that court. She was accompanied by Eugene Wrona as “assistance of counsel” pursuant to the U. S. Constitution Amendment VI, and Pennsylvania Colonial Law, incorporated under 1 Pa.C.S.A. §1503, to wit, The Frame of Government of 1682.

Judge Clark would hear none of this and as his first business, he discharged Wrona, your scribe, from the Well. Claudia stood alone to face the court (Clark), BCP [Michael Gerdes replaced Silcox] in an effort to learn the nature and cause of the action against her.

Clark ignored her requests/demands for due process and her rights under the U.S. Constitution. He did not inform her that the action against her was “criminal” in nature. He also failed to require Plaintiff to establish jurisdiction in DCCCP.

Settled Law holds that when a court proceeds without jurisdiction, any judicial action is void ab initio. Further, in all criminal proceedings, a defendant must be afforded a trial by jury (U.S. Constitution Article III and Amendment VI) and the assistance of counsel (Amendment VI). Judge Clark disregarded his oath of office to violate the civil and constitutional rights of Claudia Montelione on March 4, 2008. Also when he discharged the “assistance of counsel”, settled Law holds that he forfeited any jurisdiction that may have been vested in DCCCP. Every action by Clark in the matter became void ab initio for lack of jurisdiction.

Claudia was ordered to comply with the BCP subpoena within 10 days or be held in “Contempt of Court”. This was a final order from which Claudia had the right of appeal within 30 days [Pa Constitution, Article V § 9]. Her right of appeal was interrupted by an order, void ab initio, to appear for contempt hearing in Dauphin County. Knowing the D.C. court did not intend to administer lawful justice, Claudia relied on her training as a law merchant and closed the case commercially by tendering a payment instrument to the court under a pre-arrangement with the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury. The payment was witnessed by Massachusetts Notary Public Kevin Mahoney. Her “Bonded Promissory Note” (BPN) bonded the action instead of allowing Dauphin County to bond the case. With apparent contempt for commercial law and disregard of 28 U.S.C. § 2041 which requires the payment to be forwarded to the Department of Treasury, Judge Clark called the instrument “bogus” and when Claudia failed to appear for the March 28, 2008 hearing due to closure of the case, a Bench Warrant for her arrest was issued. She was taken into custody the very next day and brought to Dauphin County Prison (DCP).

To this point, Claudia was not yet informed that the “complaint” being “investigated” was for unauthorized practice of Law, a misdemeanor. However, charges of Retaliation against a prosecutor or judicial official under § 4953.1 of the Pa Criminal Code were brought against Claudia. Somehow, the instrument issued to peaceably settle and close the case was called a “judgment”.

When she failed to appear, a Bench Warrant for her arrest was issued, and she was taken into custody and brought back to Dauphin County on March 29, 2008.

To this point, Claudia was not yet informed that the “complaint” being “investigated” was for unauthorized practice of Law, a misdemeanor.

The March 10, 2008, hearing by the Secretary of State concluded in Claudia’s favor. Nevertheless, Douglas Cassel, attorney for the Secretary told the court that the Secretary wanted to “send a message” to others regarding the practices of notaries public in which Claudia engaged, despite the fact that she provided only such notary services as identified with her commission and or authorized under the UCC, and were enumerated on the State’s website.

When Claudia was incarcerated on 29 March, 2009, she had been deprived of notice (due process) by BCP, had not been advised of her rights under the 5th Amendment, and had been ordered to appear in a foreign jurisdiction to face charges without a complaint, depriving her of due process and equal protection of Law. And let us not forget the subpoena issued under color of Law.

Is it right for a government agency to abuse its authority? Even if the target of the investigation is guilty, does the End justify the Means? Can the government DENY a person due process?

Here, the alleged “crime” is a misdemeanor for which BCP trampled on Claudia’s rights and TRASHED the U.S. CONSTITUTION. For Shame!

So what did the court, Judge Clark, do? First, he deprived the accused of assistance of counsel, compelling her to proceed pro se against unknown charges, then further excusing Kathryn Silcox from appearing for BCP. Claudia could not even face her protagonist. Next, he refuses Claudia’s demand (under due process) to learn the nature and causes of the action, whether civil or criminal, among others, and entered “non-entertaining orders”, his language, to deny several motions, petitions and/or judicial notice actions of defendant. His demeanor and language, replete with threats, disparaged and disrespected this intelligent and competent woman, untrained in the law from exercising rights secured to every American Citizen through the Bill of Rights. Pennsylvania also protects these rights in its Constitution and statutes. Clark violated his Oath of Office to “war with the U.S. Constitution”.

What is a “non-entertaining” order? Are they “Lawful”?

A judge at war with the Constitution acts under color of law and without jurisdiction and without immunity afforded that office. His judicial determinations are void ab initio, except to dismiss the action.

Clark’s Order compelling Claudia to comply with the BCP subpoena is unenforceable as being void ab initio. As a matter of Law and due process, every subsequent action by the court, Commonwealth, BCP, Pennsylvania State Police, their agents et al, is taken under color of law, which is, without any law to support the action or enforcement.

Claudia’s daughter, Francesca, filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus in federal court to obtain the release of her mother from this oppressive incarceration in Dauphin County. Federal district judge Sylvia Rambo dismissed the writ arguing that “daughter and best friend lacks standing to file a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a legal doctrine dating to the Magna Carta. Is Rambo correct? Or, was she “playing ball” with Dauphin County?

Francesca attempted other means to get her mother out of jail, including serving an administrative demand for release from illegal incarceration upon A.G. Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Judge Lawrence F. Clark, Jr. and DCP Warden Dominick DeRose. The Respondents were duty-bound to answer the affidavit in a private process witnessed by notary public Kevin Mahoney. For her efforts taken on behalf of her mother, the Attorney General sent his attack dogs, the Special Investigation Division of the Pennsylvania State Police, to wit, Trooper Denny L. Grimm, to file criminal charges against Claudia, Francesca and a Massachusetts notary public, Kevin Mahoney. The “Retaliation” charge was extended to Francesca and Kevin and collateral charges of three counts of Conspiracy (§ 903) were added. The victims named are Corbett, Clark and DeRose. However, the Commonwealth neglects to note that a prison warden is not included as an officer protected under § 4953.1. It proceeded to prosecute Claudia through Dauphin County D.A. Ed Marsico and Deputy D.A. Jenni Henley Allen in a trial separate from her “co-conspirators”, Francesca and Kevin. This makes it easier to limit evidence, etc. . . . at the same trial, thereby supporting the contention that the Commonwealth was not seeking justice, equality under the law.

Francesca attempted other means to get her mother out of jail, including filing a Bonded Promissory Note that bonds the action instead of allowing Dauphin County to bond the case. For her efforts, taken on behalf of her mother, the Attorney General sent his attack dogs, the Special Investigation Division of the Pennsylvania State Police, to wit, Trooper Denny L. Grimm, to file criminal charges against Claudia, Francesca and a Massachusetts notary public, Kevin Mahoney. The charges include filing false “bogus” financial documents, later withdrawn and from them, charges of Retaliation against a prosecutor or judicial officer under § 4953.1 of the PA Criminal Code. Collateral charges of three counts of Conspiracy (§ 903) were added. Named as victims are AG Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Judge Lawrence F. Clark, Jr. and Dauphin County Prison (DCP) Warden Dominic DeRose.

The Commonwealth neglects to note that a prison warden is not included as an officer protected under this statute. It proceeded to prosecute Claudia for three counts each of Retaliation and Conspiracy through Dauphin County DA Ed Marsico and Deputy DA Jenni Henley Allen.

Francesca Montelione and Kevin Mahoney face similar charges. It appears that the Commonwealth has decided on separate trials, which makes it easier to limit evidence for the defense and limits exculpatory testimony that may persuade a single jury if it heard all three defendants at the same trial.

Claudia was brought to trial on July 28, 2009 to face six criminal charges. Apparently, Trooper Grimm learned that the BPN was bona fide and not “bogus” as his Affidavit of Probable Cause” states. Since it appears that this document is instrumental to the charges of Retaliation, one must ask “What is the basis for the criminal charges?”

The State brought Claudia to trial allegedly for “retaliation” against the Attorney General a judge and the prison warden, each of whom are named. The Law requires that an accused MUST be afforded the opportunity to face ones accuser(s). Federal case law also states that a State may never be the victim of a crime because the State is a fiction, not a real person, and the accused is unable to face his/her accuser. Neither Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Lawrence F. Clark, Jr., nor Dominic DeRose testified.

Against Claudia, the State substituted two attorneys to testify for the prosecution against the defendant. One must assume that those attorneys appeared as an “expert witness” under Rules of Evidence. The DA through Deputy DA Jenni Henley Allen, neglected to inform the defense of these “expert” witnesses, thereby denying her rights to obtain experts to rebut the testimony. If these witnesses, whose testimony is relied upon by the prosecution, are not “expert witnesses”, their testimonies are inadmissible, either as Hearsay, or as testifying to “conclusions of Law”. Admitting their testimonies deprives the defendant of civil and constitutional rights - in addition to being denied “assistance of counsel”.

Doesn’t the judge have a fiduciary duty to protect the Constitutional Rights of defendants? Did Judge Charles Brown, Jr. perform his duties with fidelity to his Oath of Office? Was Claudia afforded due process and equal protection of Law? Did she have a fair trial?

On July 28, 2009, this scribe appeared at DCCCP intending to serve as “assistance of counsel” for Claudia pursuant to Amendment VI of the U.S Constitution and as provided under Pennsylvania Law in the Frame of Government of 1682, a document incorporated into Law as a prior Treaty and under 1 Pa.C.S.A. § 1503 as Colonial Law.

Judge Brown began by addressing the courtroom, before the jury was seated, that the defendant had refused “representation” by a public defender. However, he directed that attorney to remain with defendant which gives the appearance that Claudia had assistance of counsel. Brown made other remarks/announcements then entered into an exchange of dialogue with this scribe, Eugene Wrona, an attorney, trained in the Law and authorized to practice Law in the District of Columbia as a commissioned private attorney general.

Brown recognized Wrona pursuant to Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3.A(4) according him a “full right to be heard according to Law” as a person legally interested in the proceeding. In this dialogue, Wrona did not represent Claudia. To the contrary he denied representing her but offered a compelling argument as to why he should be permitted to “assist” her as counsel pursuant to her rights under Amendment VI and the Frame of Government of 1682. Wrona read into the record the relevant clause from Colonial Law that supports and endorses this position. Brown ultimately appointed Wrona as “assistance of counsel” under the caveat that advice could only be offered during recesses or breaks from outside the “bar”.

Is that what the Framer’s intended as “assistance of counsel”?

Did William Penn agree that the assistance of a friend shall be offered to the court from the audience during recesses when he signed the Frame of Government of 1682?

During the dialogue between Judge Brown and Wrona, First Assistant DA Francis T. Chardo entered the sanctuary of the courtroom with deputy sheriffs. Chardo interrupted the dialogue to introduce himself and to announce that he was taking Wrona into custody (arresting him) for unauthorized practice of Law, claiming it was a “second offense”.

It may be that Chardo, who once ran for judge, is unfamiliar with Canon 3.A(4) of the Code of Judicial Conduct as well as the federal and State Constitutions that prohibit being twice put in jeopardy for the same offense. Detective Jerome P. Wood had twice earlier brought the same charge against Wrona, once in April, then after failure to prosecute on May 26, 2009, the same charge was brought which must be again dismissed under the Constitution. When fairly adjudicated, the score will be Wrona - 2; Dauphin County - 0. The arrest of Wrona is still a “first offense”.

Chardo’s criminal charge does not pass the “smile” test when held against Canon 3.A(4). The arrest of Wrona from the sanctuary of a courtroom exposes Chardo as a thug, unfit for office. Prior and subsequent charges for the same or related events are “counterfeit securities”, the filing of which are criminal acts as well as “Official Oppression”.

Does it appear that the courtroom confrontation with Chardo was “orchestrated” in advance? Was Judge Brown a conspirator with DA Chardo? Did DA Marsico have knowledge or approve of this arrest? Was Detective Wood in the courtroom?

Chardo’s efforts to harass, intimidate, coerce and oppress Wrona via multiple charges must be seen for what they are - action taken under color of law for unlawful purposes by persons, but for the office they hold, who would not be able to sniff at meeting the burden of proof for prima facie evidence.

After Chardo interrupted the dialogue between Judge Brown and Wrona, the judge permitted Wrona to address the court again. Brown appointed Wrona as “assistance of counsel” for Claudia with the conditions stated above. Subsequently, or shortly thereafter, Judge Brown told Chardo to do what he had to do. Wrona was belted and cuffed and physically removed from the courtroom, a State - Sanctioned Kidnapping.

Wrona was taken to a holding cell until paperwork was completed and then he was taken, by Detective Wood and an unidentified detective to the office of District Justice Joseph S. Solomon for a bail hearing.

Wood told Solomon that the DA wanted a $100,000.00 bail bond for a third class misdemeanor. Justice Solomon determined that Wrona was not a flight risk and Wrona was released on his Own Recognizance (ROR) with a minor special condition.

Wrona did not return to the courtroom to avoid violating the condition of bail.

Claudia’s trial went into the second day, when a jury found her guilty of all six charges without one “victim” appearing to testify against her.

Whatever happened to the Constitution, and the Oaths of Office of Judges, prosecutors and Law officers who swore to support and defend it? Would anyone care to see the “jury instructions” as issued by Brown to the jury? I would.

On September 12, 2009, Claudia was sentenced. DA Allen castigated her for her alleged crimes, adding BCP attorney Michael Gerdes as another victim. Allen condemned Claudia for showing “no remorse” for her conduct which most non-partisan people would agree was, standing up for the Constitutions; refusing to waive her Rights; exercising her Rights, etc.

DA Jenni Henley Allen showed no remorse for prosecuting Claudia in violation of her 6th Amendment Rights to face Attorney General Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Judge Lawrence F. Clark, Jr., and Warden Dominic DeRose. Allen showed no remorse for allowing state - paid attorneys to testify as witnesses contrary to the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Following sentencing, Wrona prepared a Notice of Appeal and a Motion for Relief: Judgment Non Obstante Veredicto as “counsel” for Claudia under the 6th Amendment and the Frame of Government of 1682. He left for two weeks vacation, returning home at 10 PM on 30 September 2009. Wrona left home at 7 AM on 1 October 2009 for his Arraignment in Dauphin County. USPS held Wrona’s mail from September 15 to October 1, 2009. Wrona received NO MAIL after September 14, 2009 until after his next arrest on October 1, 2009 by DA Chardo during the Arraignment.

ARREST of Eugene Wrona

On 1 October 2009 Wrona appeared for Arraignment. After checking in I, [Gene Wrona] was accosted by DA Chardo who told the clerk; “I’ve got this one.” I did not recognize him at the time. He escorted me directly to the processing desk, produced my paperwork and told me that I was pleading “Not Guilty. Right?” and he wrote “Not Guilty” on the Arraignment form.

I told him that he cannot fill in the form for me and he responded with “Are you refusing to sign?” after which he said they had two Bench Warrants for my arrest. I asked “What for?” He said for leaving the country, violating conditions of bail. He did not present either Bench Warrant. I told him that I was not refusing to sign the Arraignment form and asked him for the paper and a pen, which he gave to me.

I briefly read over the form and scratched through his “Not Guilty” writing and began writing “Innocen ---“ when he ripped the pen from my hand and said to a different staff member “Refuses to sign.”

I then asked his name. He said, “That’s it! You’re gone and you’re not coming back.” I (later) learned his name from a deputy sheriff.

Again, I was arrested by Chardo within a courtroom. This time he alleged to have Bench Warrants which were not served, and which I had not seen. I learned later, after my brother, Reg, opened my mail that the warrants were issued for “criminal activity”, violating conditions of bail. The activity? Filing a “Notice of Appeal” for Claudia on 28 September 2009.

Chardo led me through the crowd and I was delivered over to deputies who put me in a holding cell after preliminary processing. My possessions were catalogued. I was of course handcuffed and belted.

When the paperwork arrived, already signed by Detective Wood for that date, another detective, unnamed, took me for a bail bond hearing.

Before going before the magistrate, I negotiated to put my briefcase in my car which was parked in the parking deck behind the courthouse. I was taken in handcuffs for that purpose. Leg irons were put on for my trip to District Justice Barbara Pianka, and not Joseph S. Solomon whose name was on the document.

The unnamed detective deposited me “alone” in a waiting room outside the magistrate’s courtroom. I estimate the time as being between 10 and 20 minutes. Neither the detective nor the “partner” were in the room with me. When I was finally brought before Pianka, it was apparent that ex parte communications had taken place.

Justice Pianka asked if I understood the charges. I answered that I had not even seen them and would like to read them. She permitted me to side-step in leg irons to the end of the counter to read the criminal complaint by Detective Wood, who was not present.

After reading the complaint I was again brought before the magistrate. She again asked if I understood the charges. I responded with a conditional “Yes” and began to ask a question. District Justice Pianka stated “Bail is set at $50,000.00. She banged the gavel, and left the courtroom. I asked if I would be permitted a phone call. I was directed to a phone, but could not reach my party, since it was a toll call, I presume.

During the entire court proceeding the prosecutor, unnamed detective, spoke not a word. There was no discussion or questions about risk of flight or other related bail issues. It is reasonable to conclude that the detective used his most persuasive manner to convince Pianka ex parte to set an excessive bail per demands of Chardo.

I was then taken for processing, fingerprints, photos, etc. and then transported to DCP (Dauphin County Prison) on Thursday, 1 October 2009 for my first ever overnight in jail.

Note 1: On 28 September 2009 I was in Munich, Germany, and did not file the Notice of Appeal.

Note 2: I was incarcerated in the Classification Unit [A Block] in DCP for 8 days. A Block inmates are not permitted pen/pencil or paper except to submit Inmate Request Forms. I first received a pad of paper and this pen on October 15, 2009, two weeks after my incarceration.
Bail Issues

On 5 October 2009 I was “compelled” to meet with a public defender who “represented” me and about a dozen other inmates for a Live Video Rule 150 Bail Hearing where a judge and prosecutors in the courthouse dealt with a public defender and inmates in DCP. DA Chardo was among the prosecutors. He asked several times for my case to be moved up, presumably so he would not be detained. I had no knowledge of these proceedings and had never been served with the documents of my arrest, so I, and probably the public defender, were ignorant of the goals of the prosecutor and possibly the judge who I do not know. It may have been Judge Evans.

When I expressed my ignorance, the judge waived some papers in front of the camera, as if I should be familiar with them, and mentioned something about a Judge Turgeon being assigned to my case. The outcome of that Rule 150 hearing was two interlocutory orders for bail at $5,000.00 each, pending review by judge Turgeon.

On 5 October, 2009 my brother met with a Bail Bondsman, Costopoulis, to post $50,000.00 bail for my release. I was taken to the Records room in DCP to sign the paper(s). I did not recognize the date on one document and asked to read it. A staff member said that I would not be released even if I signed, that another $10,000.00 [cash?] was necessary, evidently the result of the AM Rule 150 hearing, to secure my release.

Interlocutory bail orders serve as a bar to obtaining bail.

On October 6, 2009 I was again cuffed and shackled and dragged to court where I appeared before Judge Jeannine Turgeon. I met there with another public defender for 5 - 10 minutes in preparation for a bail bond/bail revocation hearing. Apparently, the ROR bail I thought applied had been revoked and now Turgeon was following up on the interlocutory orders issued at the Live Video Rule 150 hearing of the day before.

Turgeon listened while a Deputy DA (I think Allen) spewed nonsense about my conduct, never addressing any “flight risk” issues, then asked the PD to answer. I had consented to his representation at this hearing because again, I had not seen any paperwork or been afforded time to digest the material. The PD did reasonably well, but I asked the court’s permission to correct some misstaments and to add other facts. Turgeon granted permission. As I was addressing the court, the PD requested permission to be excused. What does that say?

Ultimately, Turgeon asked me “What would it take” for me to not assist litigants. She asked if I was being paid, and from where I derived my income.

I answered that I was not paid by any “clients” for legal work, and told her the source of my income. It is clear that the “practice of Law” is not an issue. I mentioned something about my integrity that prevents me from not assisting others, or even saying that I would stop assisting those who ask for my help.

Turgeon then increased the bond on the two interlocutory orders from $5,000.00 each to $25,000.00 each. She also added special conditions for bail which do not comport with the Rules for Bail Bonds. (See Rule 525, 526 & 527). Turgeon also applied the “special conditions” to the $50,000.00 bail issued by District Justice Pianka on October 1, 2009.

Does the PA Constitution section that prohibits excessive bail mean anything? Should an unproven violation of a misrepresented Administrative statute 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 2524, demand $1000,000.00 bail with “special conditions”, while violations of the criminal code, Title 18, are frequently bonded for $10,000.00 or less? What is/are the “penal code” of Pennsylvania, and where is it found?

How does an inmate preserve his constitutional Right for “Equal Protection of the Law”? Do judges have a fiduciary duty to that end?

At this point, one might assume that Wrona could be released on bail for $100,000.00 and the special conditions added by Turgeon. Not So! My brother spoke with Costopoulis to arrange for bail and was told that the DA (possibly Chardo) had added other conditions, to wit, if any charges are brought against Dauphin County, Wrona forfeits $100,000.00. Costopoulis would not post bail under those conditions.

My brother contacted another Bail Bondsman and drove to DCP to arrange bail. After arriving at DCP he was told the same story with slightly more details. He understood the Bail Bondsman to say that the DA (Chardo) requires a $100,000.00 letter of credit which would be forfeited if Wrona files or causes to be filed any charges against Dauphin County.

Do we have a great government, or What?

Does this demand, in and of itself, not violate the Law as well as the Rights of a defendant? Does it not TRAMPLE on the U.S. Constitution?

While Wrona languishes in DCP, filing deadlines are tolling. Claudia also languishes in jail with no one “on her side” able to advance the issues for her appeal. It appears that the Commonwealth may achieve procedurally what it cannot achieve on the merits and under Law. The action(s) against Claudia are all “under color of Law” for lack of jurisdiction.

During this process, my brother engaged an attorney to get me released on bail. For professional reasons, I will not identify him. However, as you can tell by the results, he is ineffective. He met with me one time in DCP and took some of my documents, including an Affidavit I executed here in DCP. He promised to make copies of everything I gave him. I am still waiting . . . . He does not return phone calls to my brother and does not answer communications Faxed to his office. I am concerned that he has been threatened or intimidated by the DA, and that he violated attorney - client privilege by sharing information with the DA.

A preliminary hearing was scheduled for October 21, 2009 for the October 1, 2009 complaint. My brother and others planned to attend, and to bring a recording device to preserve the record. I asked the cell block counselor to confirm the docket ad was told that the case was transferred to Judge Turgeon in DCCCP. I scurried to inform my brother, lawyer and others that the hearing was cancelled - based on information of the counselor.

Surprise! At 7:15 AM on the 21st, a CO told me he was coming for me in a half hour. I was shackled and cuffed and let to a holding area for a Preliminary Hearing before District Judge Solomon at DCP.

Another Surprise! The attorney decided to stop by anyway so he was present to “represent” me. He remarked that he had “forgotten” his recorder and asked a court reporter if she would transcribe my Preliminary Hearing. The answer was “No”.

Justice Solomon found that Commonwealth established a prima facie case and bound the charge over to DCCCP. A dismissal of the charge would have resulted in a Windfall reduction of Bail by $50,000.00.

In the mean time. Chardo called the prisoner at DCP to offer a deal . In exchange for a guilty plea, Wrona would be released immediately and sentenced to parole (unspecified) and “extensive probation”. He made this offer on or about October 15, 2009. The offer was immediately declined and Chardo was informed that Wrona had an attorney in the matter.

The public should learn that parole and probation are “weapons” of the penal system to perpetuate recidivism. Jails appear to be populated by inmates for parole or probation violations as much as for criminal conduct. Once you are “in the system”, the long arm of the penal system will try to keep you there and bring you back. A DUI could be used to incarcerate a parolee.

Summary

Claudia Montelioe has been incarcerated for more than 18 months as a result of exercising her constitutionally protected Rights. She was persecuted by BCP and the Attorney General of PA and prosecuted in Dauphin County without ever establishing jurisdiction in that county. Claudia, her daughter Francesca, and Kevin Mahoney are each accused of fabricated crimes that never occurred. The alleged “victims” did not testify at Claudia’s trial, yet she was convicted. The DA knowingly and intentionally violated Claudia’s Rights and the Rights of Francesca and Kevin to prosecute these absurd and frivolous charges. The court, magisterial and common pleas, enabled these false prosecutions by failing to hold the prosecutors to the letter of the Law, the U.S. Constitution and their Oaths of Office, judges included.

For offering legal assistance to Claudia, Eugene Wrona became a target of a corrupt legal system. On at least four separate occasions, criminal charges were brought against him for violating the “penal code” of Pennsylvania. Prosecutors have not yet defined “penal code” and other terms for the offense charged.

Commonwealth failed to prosecute the first charge and re-filed it, violating the Constitution prohibiting double jeopardy. The third charge is bogus, see Canon 3.A(4) of CIC. The last charge is to cover-up a false arrest.

Claudia and Francesca Montelione

2009-11-12T21:11:00.014-05:00

Pennsylvanians have a right to know of Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Lawrence F. Clark’s use of state resources in pursuing his personal litigation against Claudia Monetelione, her daughter, Francesca S. Montelione and the Recorder of Deeds of Luzerne County. The matter arose when Francesca, who held Power of Attorney for her mother while Claudia was illegally incarcerated in Dauphin County Prison, recorded an Affidavit at the courthouse in Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County. The Affidavit demanded that the Respondents, Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett, Judge Lawrence F. Clark and Warden Dominick DeRose either show how their imprisonment of Claudia did not violate the federal criminal code and Pennsylvania statutes or release her. Without any of the Respondents answering the Affidavit, thus indicating their agreement with its claims, Judge Clark took exception to the public filing of the Affidavit. He sued to have it removed using state paid attorneys and more than likely, public resources for all of the administrative services necessary in pressing litigation: Preparation and typing of documents; making copies; mailing expenses, etc.

The other ethical defect in Judge Clark’s action is the fact that the case of Lawrence F. Clark, et al v. Claudia Montelione, et al, [CP-22-MD-0000453-2008] was brought while Claudia was in prison upon Clark’s Order following an illegal court action he had presided over [presumably 2008 CV 875 EQ see page 3 of 4 Docket Number: CP-22-MD-0000453-2008] in March of 2008. Claudia asserts that she knew nothing about the case against her in Luzerne County and was only aware of it when the final Order was served upon her in Dauphin County Prison on September 15, 2008. It was no surprise that the case was decided in Clark’s favor by Judge Ann Lokuta who was subsequently removed from the bench. Mark A. Ciavarella, Jr. who was President Judge at that time, is presumed to have had full knowledge of the case. He apparently didn’t see anything wrong with the main defendant not knowing there was a case against her and a search of public dockets through The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania’s website to link Claudia’s name to this alleged Luzerne County case is not found. What has been found is a "Sealed Order by Atty General's Office".

Notice in the following Luzerne County Civil Division "DISPOSITION" that the date Case No. 11530-2008 (Clark, Jr. and Pierantoni, III vs. Montelione, et al) was tried before the Honorable Ann Lokuta is memoralized as the "15th day of September 2008". So; How can it be that this "DISPOSITION" document for 0115302008 (page) 0009 is bar-code recorded as being filed with the Prothonotary on 9/11/2008 at 2:40:09 PM?

How can Pennsylvanians expect “honest services” from judges and public officials who have the moral sense of a reptile and how can we afford to pay the salaries and pensions of such in these hard economic times?

A return to the “Rule of Law”, “Due Process” and ethics at all levels of government (and its judiciary) is desperately needed.

Nancy Lazaryan

2009-11-06T11:55:00.001-05:00

Nancy Lazaryan speaks with her co-host, from many public access broadcasts, that they have done together out of the Minneapolis, Minnesota area.

This or other video clips might be used in our "In the Interests of Justice" documentary series co-produced by Steven G. Erickson and Francis C. P. Knize.

Lord Christopher Monckton gives US a prophet's warning

2009-11-03T16:36:00.003-05:00

On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming.

Bob Hurt on "Immunity"

2009-11-02T11:01:00.004-05:00

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to Lawmen Newsletter FREE
Download Files FREE from the Lawmen Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with GetZooks!Save Fuel
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank 9 Wheaton (22 US) 904; 6 L. Ed. 24, (1824), the Court stated, in part: "The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty; exercises no power or privilege which is not derived from the charter."

"Governments lose their immunity and descend to level of private corporations when involved in commercial activity enforcing negotiable instruments, as in fines, penalties, assessments, bails, taxes, the remedy lies in the hand of the state and its municipalities seeking remedy." Rio Grande v. Darke, 167 P. 241.

Other cases:

"The rule of governmental immunity as to all political subdivisions of government is hereby abrogated as it has heretofore been abrogated as to municipal corporations, i.e., cities. No longer is the defense of governmental immunity for tort liability available, irrespective of whether the involved political subdivision is functioning 'governmentally' or 'proprietarily'." MYERS v GENESSEE COUNTY , 375 Mich 1, 1965.

"The principal of sovereign immunity is not one which allows the sovereign to continue to inflict injury.... [sovereign immunity] does not give the sovereign the right to totally disregard the effect of it's actions upon the public." Shaw v. Salt Lake County , 224 P2d 1037.

"Sovereign immunity does not apply where (as here) government is a lawbreaker or jurisdiction is the issue." Arthur v. Fry, 300 F.Supp. 622 (1960).

"The general rule is that a qualified immunity defense fails once a plaintiff has alleged that defendants have violated the plaintiff's clearly established rights. Occasionally, however, objectively "extraordinary circumstances" are present which combine to justify a grant of immunity nonetheless." Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 819 (1982).

*On Our Adversarial System; Mack vs. City of Detroit, Chief Justice Cavanagh, No. 118468, 2002.

"The adversarial system ensures the best presentation of arguments and theories because each party is motivated to succeed. Moreover, the adversarial system attempts to ensure that an active judge refrain from allowing a preliminary understanding of the issues to improperly influence the final decision. This allows the judiciary to keep an open mind until the proofs and arguments have been adequately submitted. In spite of these underlying concerns, the majority today claims that the benefits of full briefing are simply a formality that can be discarded without care. The majority fails to comprehend how the skilled advocates in this case could have added anything insightful in the debate over the proper interpretation of a century's worth of precedent. Whatever its motivation, the majority undermines the foundations of our adversarial system."

When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost. Rankin v. Howard, (1980) 633 F.2d 844, cert den.Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326.

In Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (1980) the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary immunity prongs were absent; later, in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072 (1986), the Ninth Circuit, en banc , criticized the "judicial nature" analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive. But Rankin's ultimate result was not changed, because Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction.

Some Defendants urge that any act "of a judicial nature" entitles the Judge to absolute judicial immunity. But in a jurisdictional vacuum, (that is, absence of all jurisdiction) the second prong necessary to absolute judicial immunity is missing. Stump v. Sparkman, id., 435 U.S. 349.

"Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction." Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872)

A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter andperson, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts. Davisv. Burris, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689 (1938)

Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. Gregory v. Thompson, 500 F2d 59 (C.A.Ariz. 1974)

There is a general rule that a ministerial officer who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign. Cooper v. O'Conner,99 F.2d 133

When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision madein good faith, that he had jurisdiction. State use of Little v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 217 Miss. 576, 64 So. 2d 697.

"... the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803).

"No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence." Ableman v. Booth, 21Howard 506 (1859).

"The courts are not bound by an officer's interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act." Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227F 417.

"The constitution of the Union constitutes a contract with the members and is the measure of the authority conferred upon the organization to expel or otherwise discipline them.' [Citing cases]; Accord: Leo v. Local Union No. 612 of International Union of Operating Engineers, 26 Wn.2d 498, 174 P.2d 523 (1946).

"IT IS THE DUTY OF THE COURT TO DECLARE THE MEANING OF WHAT IS WRITTEN, AND NOT WHAT WAS INTENDED TO BE WRITTEN. J.W. Seavey Hop Corp. v. Pollock, 20 Wn.2d 337, 348-49, 147 P.2d 310 (1944), cited with approval in Berg v. Hudesman, 115 Wn.2d at 669.

"It being impossible to obtain the remedy sought, the state and their agencies/municipalities being impotent to enforce their judgments/decrees and thus should not even exercise their otherwise ˜general" jurisdictions." Louisiana v. NAL, 106 La. 621. And;

"Mere equity is impotent to correct the defect." McGraw v. Gortner, 96 Md 489.;

"A law which restricts their power to render and enforce a judgment is therefore a limitation upon the exercise of jurisdiction; and a law which destroys or impairs the effect which their judgments without such law would have, is equally so." Fordyce v. Beecher, 2 Tex. Civ. App. 29, 31.